FMLP vs. PIP
Restriction: considering only configurations with homogeneous periods.
Filter: All scenarios in which LP-based analysis of the PIP does both no worse than LP-based analysis of the FMLP for any number of tasks, and strictly better for some number of tasks.
In total, 15 configurations matched the filter.
| Configuration Nr. 598 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.7583 |
| old sequence number | 1066 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 789 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2833 |
| old sequence number | 931 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 869 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1915 |
| old sequence number | 1426 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1012 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1166 |
| old sequence number | 555 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1022 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1110 |
| old sequence number | 552 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1026 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1092 |
| old sequence number | 611 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1081 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0879 |
| old sequence number | 591 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1093 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0823 |
| old sequence number | 541 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1146 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0518 |
| old sequence number | 686 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1176 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0139 |
| old sequence number | 1320 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1215 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.8927 |
| old sequence number | 1291 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1359 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1685 |
| old sequence number | 1069 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1365 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.1508 |
| old sequence number | 933 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1423 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0148 |
| old sequence number | 934 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1428 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0093 |
| old sequence number | 1294 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|