FIFO queues vs. priority queues
Restriction: considering only configurations with homogeneous periods.
Filter: All scenarios in which any FIFO-queue-based protocol does no worse than any priority-queue-based protocol for any number of tasks.
In total, 266 configurations matched the filter.
| Configuration Nr. 38 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 6.1345 |
| old sequence number | 910 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 47 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.9618 |
| old sequence number | 927 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 90 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.1918 |
| old sequence number | 908 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 122 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.7797 |
| old sequence number | 357 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 124 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.7604 |
| old sequence number | 309 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 129 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.6836 |
| old sequence number | 351 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 139 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.5911 |
| old sequence number | 337 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 151 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5088 |
| old sequence number | 308 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 152 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.4829 |
| old sequence number | 310 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 156 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.4409 |
| old sequence number | 1035 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 158 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.4089 |
| old sequence number | 319 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 160 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.3756 |
| old sequence number | 265 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 162 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.3510 |
| old sequence number | 360 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 166 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.2886 |
| old sequence number | 213 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 171 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.2155 |
| old sequence number | 318 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 172 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.2109 |
| old sequence number | 1062 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 173 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.1970 |
| old sequence number | 320 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 175 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.1767 |
| old sequence number | 339 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 191 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.9584 |
| old sequence number | 1044 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 203 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.8612 |
| old sequence number | 286 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 208 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8222 |
| old sequence number | 359 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 214 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.7012 |
| old sequence number | 306 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 219 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6753 |
| old sequence number | 292 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 220 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.6741 |
| old sequence number | 981 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 222 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6401 |
| old sequence number | 317 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 229 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6167 |
| old sequence number | 312 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 230 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6152 |
| old sequence number | 217 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 239 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.5069 |
| old sequence number | 338 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 240 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.4894 |
| old sequence number | 275 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 261 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.2997 |
| old sequence number | 295 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 270 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.2308 |
| old sequence number | 1065 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 275 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.1989 |
| old sequence number | 355 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 283 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.1241 |
| old sequence number | 358 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 289 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.0777 |
| old sequence number | 220 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 293 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.0324 |
| old sequence number | 322 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 301 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.9685 |
| old sequence number | 315 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 304 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.9149 |
| old sequence number | 294 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 311 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.8491 |
| old sequence number | 991 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 312 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.8363 |
| old sequence number | 948 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 315 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.7780 |
| old sequence number | 241 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 322 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.7115 |
| old sequence number | 1043 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 325 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.6698 |
| old sequence number | 219 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 332 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.6006 |
| old sequence number | 1000 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 335 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.5902 |
| old sequence number | 199 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 338 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.5837 |
| old sequence number | 336 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 341 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5541 |
| old sequence number | 247 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 342 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.5513 |
| old sequence number | 200 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 343 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5254 |
| old sequence number | 342 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 344 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.5172 |
| old sequence number | 989 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 345 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5102 |
| old sequence number | 1037 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 346 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.4977 |
| old sequence number | 198 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 347 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4977 |
| old sequence number | 926 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 358 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.4376 |
| old sequence number | 314 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 359 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.4348 |
| old sequence number | 273 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 360 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.4276 |
| old sequence number | 915 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 364 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.3784 |
| old sequence number | 191 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 365 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.3765 |
| old sequence number | 293 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 367 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3747 |
| old sequence number | 250 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 376 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.3515 |
| old sequence number | 193 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 380 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3306 |
| old sequence number | 952 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 381 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3265 |
| old sequence number | 352 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 382 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.3164 |
| old sequence number | 229 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 386 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3090 |
| old sequence number | 905 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 387 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3090 |
| old sequence number | 195 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 388 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3090 |
| old sequence number | 325 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 389 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.3053 |
| old sequence number | 281 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 393 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2979 |
| old sequence number | 267 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 394 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2914 |
| old sequence number | 192 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 395 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2905 |
| old sequence number | 182 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 396 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2895 |
| old sequence number | 206 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 399 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2729 |
| old sequence number | 194 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 402 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2710 |
| old sequence number | 202 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 403 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2673 |
| old sequence number | 999 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 405 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2537 |
| old sequence number | 1063 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 406 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2470 |
| old sequence number | 184 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 407 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2424 |
| old sequence number | 249 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 408 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2396 |
| old sequence number | 218 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 409 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2396 |
| old sequence number | 277 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 412 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.2313 |
| old sequence number | 240 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 413 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2303 |
| old sequence number | 188 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 415 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2155 |
| old sequence number | 196 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 422 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1980 |
| old sequence number | 185 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 423 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1961 |
| old sequence number | 280 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 424 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1952 |
| old sequence number | 344 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 425 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1943 |
| old sequence number | 345 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 426 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1933 |
| old sequence number | 297 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 427 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1933 |
| old sequence number | 313 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 428 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1869 |
| old sequence number | 946 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 430 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1859 |
| old sequence number | 324 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 431 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1832 |
| old sequence number | 270 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 432 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1822 |
| old sequence number | 269 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 433 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1684 |
| old sequence number | 189 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 436 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1674 |
| old sequence number | 328 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 437 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1640 |
| old sequence number | 972 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 440 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1563 |
| old sequence number | 291 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 441 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1517 |
| old sequence number | 284 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 443 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1489 |
| old sequence number | 268 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 444 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1471 |
| old sequence number | 204 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 445 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1460 |
| old sequence number | 1031 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 446 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1434 |
| old sequence number | 205 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 450 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1332 |
| old sequence number | 311 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 452 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1277 |
| old sequence number | 228 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 453 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1230 |
| old sequence number | 222 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 454 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1221 |
| old sequence number | 187 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 455 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1193 |
| old sequence number | 298 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 456 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1193 |
| old sequence number | 224 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 457 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1184 |
| old sequence number | 327 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 458 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1184 |
| old sequence number | 237 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 459 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1184 |
| old sequence number | 266 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 462 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1064 |
| old sequence number | 248 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 463 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1055 |
| old sequence number | 343 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 465 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0944 |
| old sequence number | 216 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 467 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0925 |
| old sequence number | 203 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 468 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0907 |
| old sequence number | 323 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 469 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0901 |
| old sequence number | 914 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 470 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0879 |
| old sequence number | 299 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 475 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0814 |
| old sequence number | 282 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 476 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0814 |
| old sequence number | 271 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 477 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0759 |
| old sequence number | 321 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 478 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0740 |
| old sequence number | 226 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 479 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0731 |
| old sequence number | 190 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 480 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0731 |
| old sequence number | 183 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 483 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0657 |
| old sequence number | 223 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 486 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0620 |
| old sequence number | 285 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 487 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0620 |
| old sequence number | 225 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 488 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0611 |
| old sequence number | 201 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 489 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0592 |
| old sequence number | 296 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 490 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0586 |
| old sequence number | 1047 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 491 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0564 |
| old sequence number | 210 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 494 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0500 |
| old sequence number | 255 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 495 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0490 |
| old sequence number | 341 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 498 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0453 |
| old sequence number | 232 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 500 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0416 |
| old sequence number | 253 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 501 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0407 |
| old sequence number | 235 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 503 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0352 |
| old sequence number | 233 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 507 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0278 |
| old sequence number | 234 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 508 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0241 |
| old sequence number | 276 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 509 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0241 |
| old sequence number | 998 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 510 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0231 |
| old sequence number | 329 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 511 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0185 |
| old sequence number | 246 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 513 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0056 |
| old sequence number | 330 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 514 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0028 |
| old sequence number | 1041 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 515 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9991 |
| old sequence number | 181 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 517 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9935 |
| old sequence number | 279 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 520 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.9870 |
| old sequence number | 1018 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 525 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9778 |
| old sequence number | 975 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 529 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9667 |
| old sequence number | 254 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 530 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9620 |
| old sequence number | 974 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 531 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9528 |
| old sequence number | 1001 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 534 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9471 |
| old sequence number | 1061 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 544 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9177 |
| old sequence number | 1016 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 545 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9137 |
| old sequence number | 1050 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 547 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9082 |
| old sequence number | 1049 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 549 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8945 |
| old sequence number | 953 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 551 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8899 |
| old sequence number | 958 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 552 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8889 |
| old sequence number | 1002 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 556 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8844 |
| old sequence number | 1003 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 562 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.8742 |
| old sequence number | 960 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 564 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8684 |
| old sequence number | 957 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 569 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8463 |
| old sequence number | 973 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 575 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8270 |
| old sequence number | 1004 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 576 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8241 |
| old sequence number | 1046 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 578 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8230 |
| old sequence number | 911 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 579 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.8222 |
| old sequence number | 1005 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 580 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8215 |
| old sequence number | 951 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 583 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8204 |
| old sequence number | 1048 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 607 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6966 |
| old sequence number | 335 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 669 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4607 |
| old sequence number | 902 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 685 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4126 |
| old sequence number | 1397 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 687 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.4070 |
| old sequence number | 1265 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 729 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3506 |
| old sequence number | 680 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 786 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2877 |
| old sequence number | 332 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 810 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2553 |
| old sequence number | 632 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 831 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2250 |
| old sequence number | 1272 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 847 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2100 |
| old sequence number | 635 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 872 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1887 |
| old sequence number | 559 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 874 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1878 |
| old sequence number | 674 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 886 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1795 |
| old sequence number | 640 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 889 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1776 |
| old sequence number | 705 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 894 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1758 |
| old sequence number | 1274 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 895 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1748 |
| old sequence number | 557 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 901 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1693 |
| old sequence number | 590 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 906 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1674 |
| old sequence number | 683 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 914 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1637 |
| old sequence number | 695 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 921 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1600 |
| old sequence number | 647 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 924 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1573 |
| old sequence number | 554 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 925 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1563 |
| old sequence number | 716 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 932 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1536 |
| old sequence number | 644 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 935 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1508 |
| old sequence number | 690 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 939 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1480 |
| old sequence number | 570 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 941 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1480 |
| old sequence number | 613 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 949 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1443 |
| old sequence number | 565 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 950 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1443 |
| old sequence number | 643 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 952 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1443 |
| old sequence number | 563 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 954 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1425 |
| old sequence number | 546 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 962 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1378 |
| old sequence number | 588 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 971 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1351 |
| old sequence number | 545 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 974 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1341 |
| old sequence number | 569 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 975 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1332 |
| old sequence number | 688 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 979 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1314 |
| old sequence number | 689 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 992 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1249 |
| old sequence number | 684 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 993 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1240 |
| old sequence number | 637 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1000 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1203 |
| old sequence number | 638 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1004 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1193 |
| old sequence number | 595 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1007 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1184 |
| old sequence number | 599 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1010 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1175 |
| old sequence number | 542 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1013 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1166 |
| old sequence number | 553 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1014 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1166 |
| old sequence number | 600 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1017 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1156 |
| old sequence number | 641 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1018 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1147 |
| old sequence number | 564 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1020 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1129 |
| old sequence number | 583 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1027 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 1273 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1028 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 544 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1029 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 1317 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1033 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1073 |
| old sequence number | 594 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1037 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1064 |
| old sequence number | 568 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1039 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1055 |
| old sequence number | 598 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1043 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1036 |
| old sequence number | 592 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1046 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1027 |
| old sequence number | 687 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1048 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1018 |
| old sequence number | 566 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1052 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1008 |
| old sequence number | 1364 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1054 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0999 |
| old sequence number | 642 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1055 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0999 |
| old sequence number | 596 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1057 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0999 |
| old sequence number | 551 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1058 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0990 |
| old sequence number | 1362 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1065 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0953 |
| old sequence number | 608 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1066 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0953 |
| old sequence number | 548 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1074 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 547 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1076 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0916 |
| old sequence number | 614 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1082 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0860 |
| old sequence number | 549 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1083 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0860 |
| old sequence number | 582 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1084 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0851 |
| old sequence number | 1363 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1088 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0842 |
| old sequence number | 1312 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1089 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0842 |
| old sequence number | 1331 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1102 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0777 |
| old sequence number | 1361 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1105 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0768 |
| old sequence number | 1311 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1109 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0749 |
| old sequence number | 1262 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1111 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0731 |
| old sequence number | 1409 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1113 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0722 |
| old sequence number | 1318 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1115 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0722 |
| old sequence number | 681 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1125 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0648 |
| old sequence number | 1271 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1127 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0648 |
| old sequence number | 1316 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1137 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0601 |
| old sequence number | 597 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1145 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0527 |
| old sequence number | 1319 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1157 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0416 |
| old sequence number | 1410 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1165 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0287 |
| old sequence number | 1333 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1205 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.9288 |
| old sequence number | 692 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1244 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.6864 |
| old sequence number | 1367 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1262 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.6290 |
| old sequence number | 302 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1282 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.5143 |
| old sequence number | 662 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1292 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4533 |
| old sequence number | 1052 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1310 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.3673 |
| old sequence number | 350 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1314 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.3497 |
| old sequence number | 710 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1321 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.3099 |
| old sequence number | 1412 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1335 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.2525 |
| old sequence number | 347 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1338 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.2340 |
| old sequence number | 707 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1345 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2192 |
| old sequence number | 920 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1377 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1119 |
| old sequence number | 917 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1382 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1064 |
| old sequence number | 1382 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1384 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0981 |
| old sequence number | 1277 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1409 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0361 |
| old sequence number | 1067 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1424 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0120 |
| old sequence number | 1427 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1433 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0037 |
| old sequence number | 935 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1437 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0019 |
| old sequence number | 1295 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1439 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0000 |
| old sequence number | 1292 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1440 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0000 |
| old sequence number | 932 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|