FIFO queues vs. priority queues
Restriction: considering only configurations with homogeneous periods.
Filter: All scenarios in which neither any FIFO-queue-based protocol nor any priority-queue-based protocol dominates each other for all numbers of tasks.
In total, 439 configurations matched the filter.
| Configuration Nr. 44 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 6.0028 |
| old sequence number | 909 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 48 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.9380 |
| old sequence number | 901 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 56 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.7616 |
| old sequence number | 907 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 59 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.6890 |
| old sequence number | 921 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 71 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.4592 |
| old sequence number | 943 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 73 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.4573 |
| old sequence number | 1058 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 74 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.4557 |
| old sequence number | 930 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 78 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.4230 |
| old sequence number | 1042 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 82 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.3206 |
| old sequence number | 1059 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 84 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.3073 |
| old sequence number | 923 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 86 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.2479 |
| old sequence number | 1038 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 87 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.2343 |
| old sequence number | 1080 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 89 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.1981 |
| old sequence number | 1036 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 91 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.1418 |
| old sequence number | 944 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 92 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.1369 |
| old sequence number | 1071 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 95 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.0734 |
| old sequence number | 1079 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 101 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.9518 |
| old sequence number | 1077 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 102 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.9407 |
| old sequence number | 1026 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 103 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.9369 |
| old sequence number | 1015 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 115 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.8366 |
| old sequence number | 941 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 118 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.8252 |
| old sequence number | 1032 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 119 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.8252 |
| old sequence number | 256 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 123 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.7714 |
| old sequence number | 1028 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 125 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.7481 |
| old sequence number | 1045 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 126 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.7424 |
| old sequence number | 353 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 130 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.6670 |
| old sequence number | 1060 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 132 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.6583 |
| old sequence number | 1006 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 133 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.6540 |
| old sequence number | 994 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 135 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.6425 |
| old sequence number | 1012 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 136 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.6330 |
| old sequence number | 984 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 142 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.5640 |
| old sequence number | 1014 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 143 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5476 |
| old sequence number | 993 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 144 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5432 |
| old sequence number | 983 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 145 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5342 |
| old sequence number | 1078 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 146 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.5319 |
| old sequence number | 331 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 147 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.5319 |
| old sequence number | 340 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 150 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.5193 |
| old sequence number | 929 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 157 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.4374 |
| old sequence number | 945 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 161 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.3691 |
| old sequence number | 262 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 164 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.3034 |
| old sequence number | 903 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 168 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.2599 |
| old sequence number | 1039 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 177 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.1393 |
| old sequence number | 985 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 180 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.1074 |
| old sequence number | 995 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 181 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.0953 |
| old sequence number | 301 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 185 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.0083 |
| old sequence number | 961 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 187 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.9917 |
| old sequence number | 354 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 194 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.9142 |
| old sequence number | 924 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 197 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.9047 |
| old sequence number | 288 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 198 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8973 |
| old sequence number | 264 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 199 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.8751 |
| old sequence number | 307 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 200 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.8730 |
| old sequence number | 1056 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 207 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8237 |
| old sequence number | 1034 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 211 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.7956 |
| old sequence number | 211 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 213 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.7500 |
| old sequence number | 967 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 215 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.6963 |
| old sequence number | 1051 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 216 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.6955 |
| old sequence number | 1029 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 221 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6522 |
| old sequence number | 963 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 223 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6298 |
| old sequence number | 1057 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 224 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6280 |
| old sequence number | 1013 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 227 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6179 |
| old sequence number | 272 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 231 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6133 |
| old sequence number | 258 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 232 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6015 |
| old sequence number | 987 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 233 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.5782 |
| old sequence number | 950 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 236 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.5541 |
| old sequence number | 214 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 238 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.5088 |
| old sequence number | 1040 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 241 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4826 |
| old sequence number | 942 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 242 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4439 |
| old sequence number | 912 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 244 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4237 |
| old sequence number | 992 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 246 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4191 |
| old sequence number | 947 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 247 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.4126 |
| old sequence number | 949 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 248 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.3904 |
| old sequence number | 928 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 251 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.3848 |
| old sequence number | 289 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 252 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.3802 |
| old sequence number | 976 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 254 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.3663 |
| old sequence number | 1076 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 255 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.3611 |
| old sequence number | 970 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 259 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.3287 |
| old sequence number | 997 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 262 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.2914 |
| old sequence number | 243 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 264 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.2775 |
| old sequence number | 263 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 268 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.2451 |
| old sequence number | 982 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 271 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.2248 |
| old sequence number | 333 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 276 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.1860 |
| old sequence number | 1033 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 278 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.1750 |
| old sequence number | 1073 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 280 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.1461 |
| old sequence number | 936 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 286 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0962 |
| old sequence number | 244 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 287 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0917 |
| old sequence number | 904 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 288 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.0817 |
| old sequence number | 990 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 290 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0444 |
| old sequence number | 969 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 292 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0333 |
| old sequence number | 274 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 294 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.0298 |
| old sequence number | 925 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 296 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.0102 |
| old sequence number | 1008 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 299 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.9880 |
| old sequence number | 906 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 300 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.9843 |
| old sequence number | 245 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 306 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.8948 |
| old sequence number | 1064 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 314 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.7835 |
| old sequence number | 215 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 316 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.7741 |
| old sequence number | 1011 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 319 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.7502 |
| old sequence number | 290 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 320 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.7433 |
| old sequence number | 1030 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 323 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.6781 |
| old sequence number | 964 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 327 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.6480 |
| old sequence number | 1017 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 328 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.6361 |
| old sequence number | 346 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 333 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5985 |
| old sequence number | 227 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 336 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5893 |
| old sequence number | 242 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 337 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.5846 |
| old sequence number | 316 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 348 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4875 |
| old sequence number | 261 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 349 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4824 |
| old sequence number | 916 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 350 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.4750 |
| old sequence number | 968 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 357 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.4394 |
| old sequence number | 259 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 366 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.3765 |
| old sequence number | 334 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 368 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3737 |
| old sequence number | 197 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 375 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3571 |
| old sequence number | 230 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 385 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3098 |
| old sequence number | 1020 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 390 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.3053 |
| old sequence number | 238 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 392 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.3034 |
| old sequence number | 236 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 398 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2794 |
| old sequence number | 303 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 400 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2720 |
| old sequence number | 186 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 401 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2710 |
| old sequence number | 1021 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 404 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2581 |
| old sequence number | 356 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 414 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2266 |
| old sequence number | 239 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 421 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2054 |
| old sequence number | 283 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 434 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1684 |
| old sequence number | 300 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 435 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1684 |
| old sequence number | 326 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 439 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1591 |
| old sequence number | 955 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 442 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1501 |
| old sequence number | 988 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 447 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1425 |
| old sequence number | 287 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 448 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1415 |
| old sequence number | 231 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 449 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1378 |
| old sequence number | 208 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 460 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1125 |
| old sequence number | 1019 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 461 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1119 |
| old sequence number | 221 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 464 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0953 |
| old sequence number | 251 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 471 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0879 |
| old sequence number | 209 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 473 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0870 |
| old sequence number | 954 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 474 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0868 |
| old sequence number | 1074 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 481 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0685 |
| old sequence number | 207 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 485 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0623 |
| old sequence number | 922 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 492 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0546 |
| old sequence number | 252 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 496 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0481 |
| old sequence number | 966 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 504 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0333 |
| old sequence number | 278 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 522 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.9806 |
| old sequence number | 913 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 523 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.9787 |
| old sequence number | 1267 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 526 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9704 |
| old sequence number | 965 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 528 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9676 |
| old sequence number | 956 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 537 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9417 |
| old sequence number | 959 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 539 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9323 |
| old sequence number | 986 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 542 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9241 |
| old sequence number | 1261 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 543 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.9237 |
| old sequence number | 1027 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 554 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8880 |
| old sequence number | 1009 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 559 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8779 |
| old sequence number | 212 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 560 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8751 |
| old sequence number | 1283 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 563 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.8686 |
| old sequence number | 1270 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 566 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8538 |
| old sequence number | 1263 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 568 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8483 |
| old sequence number | 1287 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 570 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8444 |
| old sequence number | 996 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 574 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8298 |
| old sequence number | 1419 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 586 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8093 |
| old sequence number | 971 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 589 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.7882 |
| old sequence number | 1284 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 591 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.7771 |
| old sequence number | 1420 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 594 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.7641 |
| old sequence number | 260 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 597 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.7620 |
| old sequence number | 1053 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 604 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.7142 |
| old sequence number | 1417 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 605 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.7095 |
| old sequence number | 1399 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 611 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6883 |
| old sequence number | 1304 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 616 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.6707 |
| old sequence number | 1398 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 619 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6679 |
| old sequence number | 1305 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 620 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6633 |
| old sequence number | 1264 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 621 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.6596 |
| old sequence number | 1411 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 623 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6503 |
| old sequence number | 1269 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 628 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.6300 |
| old sequence number | 1281 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 633 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6161 |
| old sequence number | 1400 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 636 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5976 |
| old sequence number | 1285 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 639 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.5902 |
| old sequence number | 1437 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 641 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5754 |
| old sequence number | 938 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 645 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.5661 |
| old sequence number | 1296 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 650 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5574 |
| old sequence number | 978 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 652 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5537 |
| old sequence number | 1290 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 654 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.5467 |
| old sequence number | 1372 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 657 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.5208 |
| old sequence number | 1276 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 660 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5116 |
| old sequence number | 1418 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 661 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.5032 |
| old sequence number | 1389 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 664 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4884 |
| old sequence number | 1302 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 665 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4810 |
| old sequence number | 1368 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 677 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4329 |
| old sequence number | 1352 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 678 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.4311 |
| old sequence number | 1366 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 680 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.4237 |
| old sequence number | 1355 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 681 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4191 |
| old sequence number | 693 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 686 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4089 |
| old sequence number | 1402 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 692 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3978 |
| old sequence number | 1440 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 693 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3969 |
| old sequence number | 697 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 694 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3950 |
| old sequence number | 1375 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 695 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3950 |
| old sequence number | 667 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 698 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3880 |
| old sequence number | 1303 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 702 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3821 |
| old sequence number | 677 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 705 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3811 |
| old sequence number | 1433 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 709 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3747 |
| old sequence number | 714 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 712 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3719 |
| old sequence number | 1431 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 717 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3669 |
| old sequence number | 1075 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 722 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3599 |
| old sequence number | 1388 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 725 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3552 |
| old sequence number | 670 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 726 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3525 |
| old sequence number | 1323 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 727 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3525 |
| old sequence number | 691 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 728 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3525 |
| old sequence number | 713 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 732 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3488 |
| old sequence number | 717 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 733 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3488 |
| old sequence number | 1354 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 734 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3488 |
| old sequence number | 618 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 735 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3478 |
| old sequence number | 1289 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 737 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3441 |
| old sequence number | 700 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 739 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3432 |
| old sequence number | 1374 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 741 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3377 |
| old sequence number | 649 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 742 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3367 |
| old sequence number | 1268 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 743 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3358 |
| old sequence number | 694 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 744 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3358 |
| old sequence number | 1010 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 745 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3330 |
| old sequence number | 648 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 746 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3321 |
| old sequence number | 715 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 753 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3256 |
| old sequence number | 1344 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 754 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3247 |
| old sequence number | 1439 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 756 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3219 |
| old sequence number | 1390 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 757 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3219 |
| old sequence number | 622 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 758 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3201 |
| old sequence number | 1345 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 760 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3201 |
| old sequence number | 1392 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 761 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3182 |
| old sequence number | 1342 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 763 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3173 |
| old sequence number | 720 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 764 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3173 |
| old sequence number | 679 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 766 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3145 |
| old sequence number | 1422 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 767 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3136 |
| old sequence number | 962 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 768 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3108 |
| old sequence number | 699 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 770 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3080 |
| old sequence number | 669 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 772 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3034 |
| old sequence number | 661 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 776 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2997 |
| old sequence number | 1405 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 778 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2979 |
| old sequence number | 1288 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 787 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2868 |
| old sequence number | 1381 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 788 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2840 |
| old sequence number | 1324 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 790 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2812 |
| old sequence number | 1396 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 792 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2803 |
| old sequence number | 668 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 793 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2794 |
| old sequence number | 1395 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 795 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2766 |
| old sequence number | 1353 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 797 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2710 |
| old sequence number | 304 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 799 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2692 |
| old sequence number | 605 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 800 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2664 |
| old sequence number | 712 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 802 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2655 |
| old sequence number | 650 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 803 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2646 |
| old sequence number | 1327 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 804 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2627 |
| old sequence number | 1307 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 808 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2553 |
| old sequence number | 574 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 809 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2553 |
| old sequence number | 1425 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 814 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2451 |
| old sequence number | 1438 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 815 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2433 |
| old sequence number | 678 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 816 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2414 |
| old sequence number | 652 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 817 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2414 |
| old sequence number | 625 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 821 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2377 |
| old sequence number | 1343 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 822 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2368 |
| old sequence number | 624 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 823 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2368 |
| old sequence number | 711 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 824 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2359 |
| old sequence number | 675 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 826 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2331 |
| old sequence number | 672 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 827 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2322 |
| old sequence number | 698 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 829 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2294 |
| old sequence number | 1282 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 830 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2266 |
| old sequence number | 719 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 832 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2248 |
| old sequence number | 634 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 833 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2248 |
| old sequence number | 575 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 834 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2248 |
| old sequence number | 1416 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 835 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2239 |
| old sequence number | 604 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 837 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2229 |
| old sequence number | 1404 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 838 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2220 |
| old sequence number | 1329 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 839 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2220 |
| old sequence number | 577 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 840 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2211 |
| old sequence number | 1386 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 841 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2192 |
| old sequence number | 702 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 842 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2192 |
| old sequence number | 1330 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 843 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2183 |
| old sequence number | 1310 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 844 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2174 |
| old sequence number | 718 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 845 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2174 |
| old sequence number | 1309 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 846 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2128 |
| old sequence number | 560 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 849 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2081 |
| old sequence number | 1373 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 850 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2081 |
| old sequence number | 646 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 851 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2081 |
| old sequence number | 1321 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 852 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2072 |
| old sequence number | 602 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 853 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2044 |
| old sequence number | 573 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 854 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2035 |
| old sequence number | 603 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 855 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2035 |
| old sequence number | 616 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 857 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2026 |
| old sequence number | 706 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 859 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1998 |
| old sequence number | 654 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 862 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1970 |
| old sequence number | 682 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 867 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1943 |
| old sequence number | 1286 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 868 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1917 |
| old sequence number | 1301 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 870 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1906 |
| old sequence number | 1308 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 873 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1887 |
| old sequence number | 623 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 875 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1869 |
| old sequence number | 1275 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 877 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1859 |
| old sequence number | 660 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 880 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1850 |
| old sequence number | 580 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 881 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1850 |
| old sequence number | 633 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 882 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1841 |
| old sequence number | 607 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 883 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1832 |
| old sequence number | 1377 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 884 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1813 |
| old sequence number | 562 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 887 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1795 |
| old sequence number | 1403 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 888 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1776 |
| old sequence number | 1424 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 891 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1767 |
| old sequence number | 619 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 892 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1759 |
| old sequence number | 1394 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 893 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1758 |
| old sequence number | 1393 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 896 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1739 |
| old sequence number | 627 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 897 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1730 |
| old sequence number | 1347 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 898 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1730 |
| old sequence number | 1357 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 902 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1693 |
| old sequence number | 628 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 903 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1684 |
| old sequence number | 657 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 904 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1684 |
| old sequence number | 1423 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 905 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1674 |
| old sequence number | 673 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 907 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1674 |
| old sequence number | 589 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 908 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1674 |
| old sequence number | 666 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 913 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1637 |
| old sequence number | 1369 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 916 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1637 |
| old sequence number | 571 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 917 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1628 |
| old sequence number | 610 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 919 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1610 |
| old sequence number | 655 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 920 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1610 |
| old sequence number | 663 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 922 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1591 |
| old sequence number | 593 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 923 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1582 |
| old sequence number | 567 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 926 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1554 |
| old sequence number | 606 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 927 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1554 |
| old sequence number | 1434 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 929 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1545 |
| old sequence number | 609 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 931 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1536 |
| old sequence number | 1350 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 934 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1526 |
| old sequence number | 1359 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 937 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1481 |
| old sequence number | 1436 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 938 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1480 |
| old sequence number | 703 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 942 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1471 |
| old sequence number | 1413 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 943 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1471 |
| old sequence number | 1380 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 946 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1462 |
| old sequence number | 579 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 947 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1452 |
| old sequence number | 1407 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 953 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1425 |
| old sequence number | 1336 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 955 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1415 |
| old sequence number | 676 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 956 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1415 |
| old sequence number | 1360 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 957 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1415 |
| old sequence number | 1371 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 958 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1406 |
| old sequence number | 1401 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 960 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1388 |
| old sequence number | 630 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 961 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1388 |
| old sequence number | 636 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 965 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1369 |
| old sequence number | 639 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 966 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1369 |
| old sequence number | 572 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 969 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1360 |
| old sequence number | 621 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 972 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1351 |
| old sequence number | 578 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 973 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1341 |
| old sequence number | 629 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 976 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1332 |
| old sequence number | 1351 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 977 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1323 |
| old sequence number | 1266 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 978 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1314 |
| old sequence number | 601 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 980 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1304 |
| old sequence number | 1325 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 981 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1304 |
| old sequence number | 631 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 982 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1304 |
| old sequence number | 615 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 983 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1295 |
| old sequence number | 558 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 985 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1286 |
| old sequence number | 585 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 987 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1267 |
| old sequence number | 1379 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 990 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1249 |
| old sequence number | 659 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 991 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1249 |
| old sequence number | 671 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 994 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1230 |
| old sequence number | 656 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 995 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1230 |
| old sequence number | 685 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 996 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1221 |
| old sequence number | 696 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 998 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1212 |
| old sequence number | 1334 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1001 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1203 |
| old sequence number | 1298 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1008 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1184 |
| old sequence number | 543 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1011 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1175 |
| old sequence number | 1421 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1019 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1147 |
| old sequence number | 1348 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1021 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1119 |
| old sequence number | 1313 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1023 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1110 |
| old sequence number | 1314 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1024 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1101 |
| old sequence number | 1332 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1025 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1092 |
| old sequence number | 1378 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1030 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 1349 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1031 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 658 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1034 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1073 |
| old sequence number | 581 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1036 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1064 |
| old sequence number | 704 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1041 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1036 |
| old sequence number | 612 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1045 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1036 |
| old sequence number | 257 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1047 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1018 |
| old sequence number | 584 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1050 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1018 |
| old sequence number | 653 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1051 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1008 |
| old sequence number | 620 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1053 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1008 |
| old sequence number | 587 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1056 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0999 |
| old sequence number | 645 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1060 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0981 |
| old sequence number | 1328 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1061 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0981 |
| old sequence number | 651 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1062 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0971 |
| old sequence number | 1358 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1067 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0944 |
| old sequence number | 1306 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1068 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0934 |
| old sequence number | 701 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1070 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 1391 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1071 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 1341 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1072 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 1365 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1077 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0916 |
| old sequence number | 576 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1078 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0897 |
| old sequence number | 1315 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1079 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0897 |
| old sequence number | 1387 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1080 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0897 |
| old sequence number | 1023 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1090 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0833 |
| old sequence number | 1346 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1091 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0833 |
| old sequence number | 1335 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1094 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0814 |
| old sequence number | 556 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1099 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0786 |
| old sequence number | 626 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1108 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0749 |
| old sequence number | 1326 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1118 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0703 |
| old sequence number | 1376 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1119 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0694 |
| old sequence number | 561 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1120 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0685 |
| old sequence number | 586 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1128 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0648 |
| old sequence number | 1406 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1133 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0629 |
| old sequence number | 550 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1139 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0592 |
| old sequence number | 1356 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1143 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0563 |
| old sequence number | 939 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1158 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0407 |
| old sequence number | 1322 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1167 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0259 |
| old sequence number | 1408 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1172 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0185 |
| old sequence number | 979 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1187 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.9991 |
| old sequence number | 348 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1188 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.9981 |
| old sequence number | 1054 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1192 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.9769 |
| old sequence number | 918 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1197 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9611 |
| old sequence number | 1435 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1199 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.9602 |
| old sequence number | 617 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1200 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9565 |
| old sequence number | 1370 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1209 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9112 |
| old sequence number | 305 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1211 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.9047 |
| old sequence number | 1007 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1212 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.9029 |
| old sequence number | 664 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1217 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.8853 |
| old sequence number | 1338 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1219 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.8621 |
| old sequence number | 1072 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1229 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.7715 |
| old sequence number | 1383 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1235 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.7410 |
| old sequence number | 708 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1238 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.7243 |
| old sequence number | 1299 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1239 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.7243 |
| old sequence number | 1414 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1240 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.7234 |
| old sequence number | 665 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1242 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.7058 |
| old sequence number | 1339 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1246 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.6753 |
| old sequence number | 980 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1250 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.6642 |
| old sequence number | 1432 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1257 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.6445 |
| old sequence number | 940 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1258 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.6411 |
| old sequence number | 1278 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1260 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.6339 |
| old sequence number | 1055 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1270 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.5657 |
| old sequence number | 1068 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1274 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.5439 |
| old sequence number | 1415 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1276 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.5375 |
| old sequence number | 349 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1277 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.5361 |
| old sequence number | 1024 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1283 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.5134 |
| old sequence number | 1340 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1293 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.4487 |
| old sequence number | 709 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1297 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4339 |
| old sequence number | 977 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1304 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.3978 |
| old sequence number | 1300 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1306 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3848 |
| old sequence number | 1384 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1309 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3774 |
| old sequence number | 919 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1313 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.3525 |
| old sequence number | 1428 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1315 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.3414 |
| old sequence number | 1025 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1323 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.3020 |
| old sequence number | 937 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1325 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.2877 |
| old sequence number | 1337 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1341 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.2303 |
| old sequence number | 1279 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1342 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2248 |
| old sequence number | 1385 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1358 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1730 |
| old sequence number | 1297 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1363 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1536 |
| old sequence number | 1022 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1367 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1415 |
| old sequence number | 1429 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1372 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.1323 |
| old sequence number | 1280 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1386 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.0916 |
| old sequence number | 1293 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1391 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0712 |
| old sequence number | 1070 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1410 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0352 |
| old sequence number | 1430 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|