FMLP vs. PIP
Restriction: considering only configurations with heterogeneous periods.
Filter: All scenarios in which LP-based analysis of the FMLP does no worse than LP-based analysis of the PIP for any number of tasks.
In total, 60 configurations matched the filter.
| Configuration Nr. 52 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.8488 |
| old sequence number | 731 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 110 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.9056 |
| old sequence number | 150 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 263 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.2895 |
| old sequence number | 161 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 266 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.2572 |
| old sequence number | 86 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 279 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.1582 |
| old sequence number | 149 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 303 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.9214 |
| old sequence number | 118 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 356 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.4403 |
| old sequence number | 102 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 512 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0185 |
| old sequence number | 116 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 518 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9917 |
| old sequence number | 21 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 538 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9417 |
| old sequence number | 41 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 565 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8603 |
| old sequence number | 96 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 600 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.7484 |
| old sequence number | 73 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 646 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5652 |
| old sequence number | 30 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 668 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4615 |
| old sequence number | 823 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 683 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4154 |
| old sequence number | 148 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 691 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3981 |
| old sequence number | 779 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 708 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3765 |
| old sequence number | 105 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 750 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3265 |
| old sequence number | 1182 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 775 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3016 |
| old sequence number | 29 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 781 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2942 |
| old sequence number | 57 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 791 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2803 |
| old sequence number | 104 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 796 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2738 |
| old sequence number | 821 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 806 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2590 |
| old sequence number | 28 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 812 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2498 |
| old sequence number | 71 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 813 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2488 |
| old sequence number | 778 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 825 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2331 |
| old sequence number | 60 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 858 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2007 |
| old sequence number | 103 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 861 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1970 |
| old sequence number | 12 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 865 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1943 |
| old sequence number | 101 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 871 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1906 |
| old sequence number | 776 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 876 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1869 |
| old sequence number | 51 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 879 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1859 |
| old sequence number | 26 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 899 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1711 |
| old sequence number | 6 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 912 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1647 |
| old sequence number | 14 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 928 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1554 |
| old sequence number | 13 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 944 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1462 |
| old sequence number | 59 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 959 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1388 |
| old sequence number | 435 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 984 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1286 |
| old sequence number | 15 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 986 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1286 |
| old sequence number | 11 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1075 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0916 |
| old sequence number | 509 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1085 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0851 |
| old sequence number | 58 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1101 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0777 |
| old sequence number | 508 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1106 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0759 |
| old sequence number | 56 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1110 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0731 |
| old sequence number | 371 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1114 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0722 |
| old sequence number | 417 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1117 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0712 |
| old sequence number | 463 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1126 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0648 |
| old sequence number | 412 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1129 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0648 |
| old sequence number | 388 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1134 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0620 |
| old sequence number | 413 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1135 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0620 |
| old sequence number | 389 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1141 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0574 |
| old sequence number | 465 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1149 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0463 |
| old sequence number | 411 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1152 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0435 |
| old sequence number | 373 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1153 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0435 |
| old sequence number | 461 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1164 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0315 |
| old sequence number | 418 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1168 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0241 |
| old sequence number | 416 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1174 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0148 |
| old sequence number | 419 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1178 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0120 |
| old sequence number | 506 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1189 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9880 |
| old sequence number | 375 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1334 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.2535 |
| old sequence number | 512 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|