No-progress vs. Classic Analysis
Filter: All scenarios in which classic analysis of the PIP does both no worse than any LP-based analysis of uncontrolled priority inversion for any number of tasks, and strictly better for some number of tasks.
In total, 478 configurations matched the filter.
| Configuration Nr. 1 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 9.4477 |
| old sequence number | 734 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 2 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 9.2147 |
| old sequence number | 733 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 3 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 9.0204 |
| old sequence number | 726 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 4 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 8.8060 |
| old sequence number | 735 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 5 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 8.6435 |
| old sequence number | 861 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 7 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 8.3075 |
| old sequence number | 746 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 8 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 8.2849 |
| old sequence number | 870 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 9 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 7.6320 |
| old sequence number | 883 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 10 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 7.6052 |
| old sequence number | 869 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 11 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 7.4583 |
| old sequence number | 732 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 12 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 7.3451 |
| old sequence number | 156 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 13 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 7.2861 |
| old sequence number | 863 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 14 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 7.2627 |
| old sequence number | 143 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 15 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 7.2167 |
| old sequence number | 831 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 16 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 7.2035 |
| old sequence number | 164 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 17 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 7.0925 |
| old sequence number | 818 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 18 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 7.0412 |
| old sequence number | 884 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 19 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 7.0329 |
| old sequence number | 748 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 20 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.7902 |
| old sequence number | 881 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 21 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 6.7424 |
| old sequence number | 165 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 22 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.7268 |
| old sequence number | 896 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 24 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 6.6657 |
| old sequence number | 840 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 25 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 6.6037 |
| old sequence number | 839 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 29 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 6.3163 |
| old sequence number | 162 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 30 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 6.2796 |
| old sequence number | 163 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 31 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 6.2720 |
| old sequence number | 147 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 32 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 6.2495 |
| old sequence number | 822 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 33 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 6.2187 |
| old sequence number | 838 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 34 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 6.2132 |
| old sequence number | 178 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 36 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 6.1558 |
| old sequence number | 853 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 38 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 6.1345 |
| old sequence number | 910 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 39 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 6.1056 |
| old sequence number | 117 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 40 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 6.0929 |
| old sequence number | 885 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 41 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.0796 |
| old sequence number | 111 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 43 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.0620 |
| old sequence number | 761 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 44 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 6.0028 |
| old sequence number | 909 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 46 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.9658 |
| old sequence number | 99 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 47 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.9618 |
| old sequence number | 927 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 48 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.9380 |
| old sequence number | 901 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 49 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.9149 |
| old sequence number | 126 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 51 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.9019 |
| old sequence number | 141 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 52 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.8488 |
| old sequence number | 731 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 53 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.8390 |
| old sequence number | 816 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 56 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.7616 |
| old sequence number | 907 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 57 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.7558 |
| old sequence number | 811 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 58 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.7115 |
| old sequence number | 134 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 59 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.6890 |
| old sequence number | 921 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 60 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.6790 |
| old sequence number | 786 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 61 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.6769 |
| old sequence number | 135 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 63 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.5883 |
| old sequence number | 120 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 65 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.5671 |
| old sequence number | 801 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 68 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.5084 |
| old sequence number | 809 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 69 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.4929 |
| old sequence number | 854 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 70 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.4593 |
| old sequence number | 810 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 71 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.4592 |
| old sequence number | 943 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 73 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.4573 |
| old sequence number | 1058 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 74 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.4557 |
| old sequence number | 930 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 75 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.4352 |
| old sequence number | 176 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 78 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.4230 |
| old sequence number | 1042 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 79 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.4045 |
| old sequence number | 792 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 80 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.3650 |
| old sequence number | 179 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 81 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.3361 |
| old sequence number | 868 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 82 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.3206 |
| old sequence number | 1059 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 83 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.3128 |
| old sequence number | 898 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 84 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.3073 |
| old sequence number | 923 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 85 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.2581 |
| old sequence number | 69 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 86 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.2479 |
| old sequence number | 1038 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 87 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.2343 |
| old sequence number | 1080 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 88 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.2130 |
| old sequence number | 851 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 89 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.1981 |
| old sequence number | 1036 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 90 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.1918 |
| old sequence number | 908 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 91 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.1418 |
| old sequence number | 944 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 92 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.1369 |
| old sequence number | 1071 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 93 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.1175 |
| old sequence number | 81 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 94 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.1101 |
| old sequence number | 98 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 95 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.0734 |
| old sequence number | 1079 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 99 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.9926 |
| old sequence number | 68 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 100 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.9741 |
| old sequence number | 87 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 101 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.9518 |
| old sequence number | 1077 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 102 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.9407 |
| old sequence number | 1026 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 103 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.9369 |
| old sequence number | 1015 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 104 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.9269 |
| old sequence number | 795 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 106 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.9241 |
| old sequence number | 83 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 109 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.9066 |
| old sequence number | 46 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 110 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.9056 |
| old sequence number | 150 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 111 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.8963 |
| old sequence number | 807 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 114 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.8444 |
| old sequence number | 133 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 115 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.8366 |
| old sequence number | 941 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 118 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.8252 |
| old sequence number | 1032 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 119 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.8252 |
| old sequence number | 256 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 120 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.8191 |
| old sequence number | 825 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 122 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.7797 |
| old sequence number | 357 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 123 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.7714 |
| old sequence number | 1028 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 124 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.7604 |
| old sequence number | 309 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 125 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.7481 |
| old sequence number | 1045 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 126 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.7424 |
| old sequence number | 353 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 128 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.6892 |
| old sequence number | 773 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 129 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.6836 |
| old sequence number | 351 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 130 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.6670 |
| old sequence number | 1060 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 131 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.6589 |
| old sequence number | 808 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 132 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.6583 |
| old sequence number | 1006 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 135 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.6425 |
| old sequence number | 1012 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 136 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.6330 |
| old sequence number | 984 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 138 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.5956 |
| old sequence number | 855 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 139 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.5911 |
| old sequence number | 337 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 141 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.5698 |
| old sequence number | 131 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 142 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.5640 |
| old sequence number | 1014 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 143 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5476 |
| old sequence number | 993 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 144 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5432 |
| old sequence number | 983 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 145 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5342 |
| old sequence number | 1078 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 146 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.5319 |
| old sequence number | 331 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 147 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.5319 |
| old sequence number | 340 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 150 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.5193 |
| old sequence number | 929 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 151 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5088 |
| old sequence number | 308 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 152 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.4829 |
| old sequence number | 310 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 154 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.4533 |
| old sequence number | 119 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 156 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.4409 |
| old sequence number | 1035 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 157 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.4374 |
| old sequence number | 945 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 158 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.4089 |
| old sequence number | 319 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 160 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.3756 |
| old sequence number | 265 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 161 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.3691 |
| old sequence number | 262 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 162 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.3510 |
| old sequence number | 360 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 163 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.3343 |
| old sequence number | 90 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 164 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.3034 |
| old sequence number | 903 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 166 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.2886 |
| old sequence number | 213 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 171 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.2155 |
| old sequence number | 318 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 172 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.2109 |
| old sequence number | 1062 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 174 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.1915 |
| old sequence number | 38 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 175 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.1767 |
| old sequence number | 339 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 177 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.1393 |
| old sequence number | 985 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 178 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.1235 |
| old sequence number | 806 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 181 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.0953 |
| old sequence number | 301 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 182 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.0890 |
| old sequence number | 794 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 185 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.0083 |
| old sequence number | 961 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 189 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.9778 |
| old sequence number | 88 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 191 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.9584 |
| old sequence number | 1044 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 194 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.9142 |
| old sequence number | 924 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 197 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.9047 |
| old sequence number | 288 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 198 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8973 |
| old sequence number | 264 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 199 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.8751 |
| old sequence number | 307 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 200 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.8730 |
| old sequence number | 1056 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 203 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.8612 |
| old sequence number | 286 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 206 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8381 |
| old sequence number | 89 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 207 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8237 |
| old sequence number | 1034 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 208 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8222 |
| old sequence number | 359 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 211 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.7956 |
| old sequence number | 211 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 213 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.7500 |
| old sequence number | 967 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 214 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.7012 |
| old sequence number | 306 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 215 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.6963 |
| old sequence number | 1051 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 216 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.6955 |
| old sequence number | 1029 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 219 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6753 |
| old sequence number | 292 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 220 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.6741 |
| old sequence number | 981 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 223 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6298 |
| old sequence number | 1057 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 224 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6280 |
| old sequence number | 1013 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 225 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.6263 |
| old sequence number | 36 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 229 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6167 |
| old sequence number | 312 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 230 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6152 |
| old sequence number | 217 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 231 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6133 |
| old sequence number | 258 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 232 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6015 |
| old sequence number | 987 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 236 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.5541 |
| old sequence number | 214 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 239 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.5069 |
| old sequence number | 338 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 241 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4826 |
| old sequence number | 942 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 242 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4439 |
| old sequence number | 912 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 245 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4209 |
| old sequence number | 72 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 248 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.3904 |
| old sequence number | 928 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 251 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.3848 |
| old sequence number | 289 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 252 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.3802 |
| old sequence number | 976 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 254 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.3663 |
| old sequence number | 1076 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 255 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.3611 |
| old sequence number | 970 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 259 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.3287 |
| old sequence number | 997 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 260 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.3071 |
| old sequence number | 24 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 262 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.2914 |
| old sequence number | 243 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 263 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.2895 |
| old sequence number | 161 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 264 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.2775 |
| old sequence number | 263 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 265 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.2651 |
| old sequence number | 836 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 266 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.2572 |
| old sequence number | 86 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 267 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.2553 |
| old sequence number | 54 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 268 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.2451 |
| old sequence number | 982 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 269 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.2424 |
| old sequence number | 45 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 270 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.2308 |
| old sequence number | 1065 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 276 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.1860 |
| old sequence number | 1033 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 278 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.1750 |
| old sequence number | 1073 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 279 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.1582 |
| old sequence number | 149 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 280 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.1461 |
| old sequence number | 936 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 282 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.1388 |
| old sequence number | 44 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 283 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.1241 |
| old sequence number | 358 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 286 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0962 |
| old sequence number | 244 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 288 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.0817 |
| old sequence number | 990 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 290 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0444 |
| old sequence number | 969 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 291 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0352 |
| old sequence number | 824 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 292 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0333 |
| old sequence number | 274 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 293 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.0324 |
| old sequence number | 322 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 294 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.0298 |
| old sequence number | 925 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 299 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.9880 |
| old sequence number | 906 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 302 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.9639 |
| old sequence number | 42 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 303 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.9214 |
| old sequence number | 118 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 304 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.9149 |
| old sequence number | 294 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 305 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.9084 |
| old sequence number | 66 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 306 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.8948 |
| old sequence number | 1064 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 311 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.8491 |
| old sequence number | 991 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 312 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.8363 |
| old sequence number | 948 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 313 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.8048 |
| old sequence number | 43 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 315 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.7780 |
| old sequence number | 241 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 316 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.7741 |
| old sequence number | 1011 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 318 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.7595 |
| old sequence number | 1086 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 321 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.7391 |
| old sequence number | 793 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 322 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.7115 |
| old sequence number | 1043 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 325 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.6698 |
| old sequence number | 219 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 327 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.6480 |
| old sequence number | 1017 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 331 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.6124 |
| old sequence number | 1095 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 332 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.6006 |
| old sequence number | 1000 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 337 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.5846 |
| old sequence number | 316 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 338 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.5837 |
| old sequence number | 336 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 340 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.5735 |
| old sequence number | 75 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 341 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5541 |
| old sequence number | 247 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 342 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.5513 |
| old sequence number | 200 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 343 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5254 |
| old sequence number | 342 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 344 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.5172 |
| old sequence number | 989 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 346 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.4977 |
| old sequence number | 198 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 347 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4977 |
| old sequence number | 926 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 348 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4875 |
| old sequence number | 261 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 349 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4824 |
| old sequence number | 916 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 350 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.4750 |
| old sequence number | 968 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 354 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4561 |
| old sequence number | 1106 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 356 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.4403 |
| old sequence number | 102 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 358 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.4376 |
| old sequence number | 314 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 360 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.4276 |
| old sequence number | 915 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 365 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.3765 |
| old sequence number | 293 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 371 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.3704 |
| old sequence number | 1094 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 373 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3633 |
| old sequence number | 777 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 380 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3306 |
| old sequence number | 952 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 384 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.3099 |
| old sequence number | 1 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 385 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3098 |
| old sequence number | 1020 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 388 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3090 |
| old sequence number | 325 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 393 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2979 |
| old sequence number | 267 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 396 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2895 |
| old sequence number | 206 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 402 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2710 |
| old sequence number | 202 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 403 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2673 |
| old sequence number | 999 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 404 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2581 |
| old sequence number | 356 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 405 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2537 |
| old sequence number | 1063 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 407 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2424 |
| old sequence number | 249 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 408 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2396 |
| old sequence number | 218 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 409 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2396 |
| old sequence number | 277 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 410 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2377 |
| old sequence number | 74 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 420 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2063 |
| old sequence number | 1191 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 421 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2054 |
| old sequence number | 283 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 423 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1961 |
| old sequence number | 280 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 424 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1952 |
| old sequence number | 344 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 425 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1943 |
| old sequence number | 345 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 426 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1933 |
| old sequence number | 297 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 427 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1933 |
| old sequence number | 313 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 430 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1859 |
| old sequence number | 324 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 431 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1832 |
| old sequence number | 270 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 432 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1822 |
| old sequence number | 269 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 434 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1684 |
| old sequence number | 300 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 435 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1684 |
| old sequence number | 326 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 437 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1640 |
| old sequence number | 972 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 440 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1563 |
| old sequence number | 291 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 441 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1517 |
| old sequence number | 284 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 442 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1501 |
| old sequence number | 988 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 443 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1489 |
| old sequence number | 268 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 444 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1471 |
| old sequence number | 204 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 445 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1460 |
| old sequence number | 1031 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 446 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1434 |
| old sequence number | 205 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 449 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1378 |
| old sequence number | 208 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 450 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1332 |
| old sequence number | 311 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 453 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1230 |
| old sequence number | 222 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 455 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1193 |
| old sequence number | 298 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 456 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1193 |
| old sequence number | 224 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 457 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1184 |
| old sequence number | 327 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 459 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1184 |
| old sequence number | 266 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 460 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1125 |
| old sequence number | 1019 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 461 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1119 |
| old sequence number | 221 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 462 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1064 |
| old sequence number | 248 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 463 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1055 |
| old sequence number | 343 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 464 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0953 |
| old sequence number | 251 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 465 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0944 |
| old sequence number | 216 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 469 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0901 |
| old sequence number | 914 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 470 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0879 |
| old sequence number | 299 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 471 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0879 |
| old sequence number | 209 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 473 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0870 |
| old sequence number | 954 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 474 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0868 |
| old sequence number | 1074 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 475 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0814 |
| old sequence number | 282 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 476 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0814 |
| old sequence number | 271 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 481 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0685 |
| old sequence number | 207 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 483 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0657 |
| old sequence number | 223 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 486 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0620 |
| old sequence number | 285 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 487 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0620 |
| old sequence number | 225 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 489 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0592 |
| old sequence number | 296 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 490 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0586 |
| old sequence number | 1047 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 491 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0564 |
| old sequence number | 210 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 492 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0546 |
| old sequence number | 252 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 494 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0500 |
| old sequence number | 255 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 495 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0490 |
| old sequence number | 341 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 496 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0481 |
| old sequence number | 966 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 504 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0333 |
| old sequence number | 278 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 505 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0324 |
| old sequence number | 23 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 506 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0296 |
| old sequence number | 516 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 508 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0241 |
| old sequence number | 276 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 509 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0241 |
| old sequence number | 998 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 510 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0231 |
| old sequence number | 329 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 511 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0185 |
| old sequence number | 246 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 512 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0185 |
| old sequence number | 116 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 513 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0056 |
| old sequence number | 330 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 514 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0028 |
| old sequence number | 1041 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 517 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9935 |
| old sequence number | 279 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 518 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9917 |
| old sequence number | 21 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 520 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.9870 |
| old sequence number | 1018 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 522 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.9806 |
| old sequence number | 913 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 525 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9778 |
| old sequence number | 975 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 528 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9676 |
| old sequence number | 956 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 530 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9620 |
| old sequence number | 974 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 531 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9528 |
| old sequence number | 1001 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 534 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9471 |
| old sequence number | 1061 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 535 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9463 |
| old sequence number | 1221 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 537 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9417 |
| old sequence number | 959 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 538 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9417 |
| old sequence number | 41 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 539 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9323 |
| old sequence number | 986 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 542 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9241 |
| old sequence number | 1261 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 544 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9177 |
| old sequence number | 1016 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 545 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9137 |
| old sequence number | 1050 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 547 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9082 |
| old sequence number | 1049 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 549 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8945 |
| old sequence number | 953 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 551 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8899 |
| old sequence number | 958 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 552 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8889 |
| old sequence number | 1002 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 555 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8870 |
| old sequence number | 791 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 556 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8844 |
| old sequence number | 1003 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 562 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.8742 |
| old sequence number | 960 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 563 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.8686 |
| old sequence number | 1270 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 564 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8684 |
| old sequence number | 957 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 565 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8603 |
| old sequence number | 96 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 569 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8463 |
| old sequence number | 973 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 570 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8444 |
| old sequence number | 996 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 573 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8353 |
| old sequence number | 53 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 575 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8270 |
| old sequence number | 1004 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 576 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8241 |
| old sequence number | 1046 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 578 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8230 |
| old sequence number | 911 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 579 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.8222 |
| old sequence number | 1005 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 580 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8215 |
| old sequence number | 951 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 581 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8205 |
| old sequence number | 27 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 583 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8204 |
| old sequence number | 1048 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 586 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8093 |
| old sequence number | 971 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 600 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.7484 |
| old sequence number | 73 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 611 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6883 |
| old sequence number | 1304 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 615 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.6707 |
| old sequence number | 771 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 617 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.6698 |
| old sequence number | 538 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 623 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6503 |
| old sequence number | 1269 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 624 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6485 |
| old sequence number | 1170 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 628 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.6300 |
| old sequence number | 1281 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 629 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6253 |
| old sequence number | 1199 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 632 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6170 |
| old sequence number | 10 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 645 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.5661 |
| old sequence number | 1296 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 646 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5652 |
| old sequence number | 30 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 652 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5537 |
| old sequence number | 1290 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 656 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5315 |
| old sequence number | 780 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 660 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5116 |
| old sequence number | 1418 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 661 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.5032 |
| old sequence number | 1389 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 664 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4884 |
| old sequence number | 1302 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 668 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4615 |
| old sequence number | 823 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 671 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.4524 |
| old sequence number | 1229 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 678 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.4311 |
| old sequence number | 1366 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 683 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4154 |
| old sequence number | 148 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 686 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4089 |
| old sequence number | 1402 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 690 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3996 |
| old sequence number | 524 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 691 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3981 |
| old sequence number | 779 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 696 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3904 |
| old sequence number | 1241 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 697 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3895 |
| old sequence number | 1091 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 698 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3880 |
| old sequence number | 1303 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 699 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3858 |
| old sequence number | 1151 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 703 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3811 |
| old sequence number | 1152 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 704 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3811 |
| old sequence number | 1166 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 706 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3774 |
| old sequence number | 1176 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 708 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3765 |
| old sequence number | 105 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 712 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3719 |
| old sequence number | 1431 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 713 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3704 |
| old sequence number | 1211 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 716 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3673 |
| old sequence number | 1183 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 720 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3630 |
| old sequence number | 866 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 721 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3617 |
| old sequence number | 1153 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 722 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3599 |
| old sequence number | 1388 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 726 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3525 |
| old sequence number | 1323 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 731 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3497 |
| old sequence number | 1196 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 735 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3478 |
| old sequence number | 1289 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 739 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3432 |
| old sequence number | 1374 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 740 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3386 |
| old sequence number | 1168 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 742 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3367 |
| old sequence number | 1268 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 747 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3275 |
| old sequence number | 1146 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 749 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3275 |
| old sequence number | 1226 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 752 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3256 |
| old sequence number | 1228 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 754 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3247 |
| old sequence number | 1439 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 758 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3201 |
| old sequence number | 1345 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 759 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3201 |
| old sequence number | 1184 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 766 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3145 |
| old sequence number | 1422 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 775 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3016 |
| old sequence number | 29 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 776 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2997 |
| old sequence number | 1405 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 778 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2979 |
| old sequence number | 1288 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 779 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2979 |
| old sequence number | 8 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 780 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2951 |
| old sequence number | 1185 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 781 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2942 |
| old sequence number | 57 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 790 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2812 |
| old sequence number | 1396 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 791 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2803 |
| old sequence number | 104 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 793 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2794 |
| old sequence number | 1395 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 796 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2738 |
| old sequence number | 821 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 798 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2692 |
| old sequence number | 1181 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 806 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2590 |
| old sequence number | 28 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 812 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2498 |
| old sequence number | 71 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 813 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2488 |
| old sequence number | 778 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 821 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2377 |
| old sequence number | 1343 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 825 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2331 |
| old sequence number | 60 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 831 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2250 |
| old sequence number | 1272 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 837 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2229 |
| old sequence number | 1404 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 838 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2220 |
| old sequence number | 1329 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 840 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2211 |
| old sequence number | 1386 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 842 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2192 |
| old sequence number | 1330 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 844 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2174 |
| old sequence number | 718 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 849 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2081 |
| old sequence number | 1373 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 851 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2081 |
| old sequence number | 1321 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 858 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2007 |
| old sequence number | 103 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 861 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1970 |
| old sequence number | 12 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 863 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1952 |
| old sequence number | 536 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 864 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1952 |
| old sequence number | 449 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 867 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1943 |
| old sequence number | 1286 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 868 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1917 |
| old sequence number | 1301 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 871 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1906 |
| old sequence number | 776 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 876 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1869 |
| old sequence number | 51 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 879 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1859 |
| old sequence number | 26 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 883 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1832 |
| old sequence number | 1377 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 885 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1804 |
| old sequence number | 450 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 887 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1795 |
| old sequence number | 1403 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 892 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1759 |
| old sequence number | 1394 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 893 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1758 |
| old sequence number | 1393 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 894 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1758 |
| old sequence number | 1274 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 897 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1730 |
| old sequence number | 1347 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 899 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1711 |
| old sequence number | 6 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 900 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1702 |
| old sequence number | 146 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 904 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1684 |
| old sequence number | 1423 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 912 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1647 |
| old sequence number | 14 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 925 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1563 |
| old sequence number | 716 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 928 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1554 |
| old sequence number | 13 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 937 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1481 |
| old sequence number | 1436 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 940 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1480 |
| old sequence number | 491 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 943 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1471 |
| old sequence number | 1380 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 944 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1462 |
| old sequence number | 59 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 947 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1452 |
| old sequence number | 1407 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 953 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1425 |
| old sequence number | 1336 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 957 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1415 |
| old sequence number | 1371 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 977 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1323 |
| old sequence number | 1266 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 986 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1286 |
| old sequence number | 11 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 987 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1267 |
| old sequence number | 1379 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 988 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1258 |
| old sequence number | 478 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 991 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1249 |
| old sequence number | 671 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 997 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1212 |
| old sequence number | 403 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1009 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1184 |
| old sequence number | 521 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1011 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1175 |
| old sequence number | 1421 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1015 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1166 |
| old sequence number | 448 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1019 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1147 |
| old sequence number | 1348 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1024 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1101 |
| old sequence number | 1332 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1025 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1092 |
| old sequence number | 1378 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1027 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 1273 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1030 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 1349 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1059 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0981 |
| old sequence number | 396 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1060 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0981 |
| old sequence number | 1328 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1070 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 1391 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1071 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 1341 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1085 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0851 |
| old sequence number | 58 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1089 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0842 |
| old sequence number | 1331 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1090 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0833 |
| old sequence number | 1346 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1091 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0833 |
| old sequence number | 1335 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1097 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0786 |
| old sequence number | 446 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1098 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0786 |
| old sequence number | 405 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1106 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0759 |
| old sequence number | 56 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1108 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0749 |
| old sequence number | 1326 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1118 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0703 |
| old sequence number | 1376 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1125 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0648 |
| old sequence number | 1271 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1128 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0648 |
| old sequence number | 1406 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1151 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0444 |
| old sequence number | 401 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1157 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0416 |
| old sequence number | 1410 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1165 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0287 |
| old sequence number | 1333 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1167 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0259 |
| old sequence number | 1408 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|