FMLP vs. PIP
Filter: All scenarios in which LP-based analysis of the PIP does both no worse than LP-based analysis of the FMLP for any number of tasks, and strictly better for some number of tasks.
In total, 215 configurations matched the filter.
| Configuration Nr. 12 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 7.3451 |
| old sequence number | 156 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 15 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 7.2167 |
| old sequence number | 831 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 19 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 7.0329 |
| old sequence number | 748 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 22 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.7268 |
| old sequence number | 896 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 26 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.4856 |
| old sequence number | 876 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 27 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.4505 |
| old sequence number | 91 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 43 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.0620 |
| old sequence number | 761 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 49 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.9149 |
| old sequence number | 126 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 57 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.7558 |
| old sequence number | 811 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 65 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.5671 |
| old sequence number | 801 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 67 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.5100 |
| old sequence number | 749 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 80 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.3650 |
| old sequence number | 179 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 83 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.3128 |
| old sequence number | 898 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 88 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.2130 |
| old sequence number | 851 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 107 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.9129 |
| old sequence number | 846 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 109 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.9066 |
| old sequence number | 46 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 138 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.5956 |
| old sequence number | 855 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 148 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.5296 |
| old sequence number | 171 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 159 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.3965 |
| old sequence number | 180 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 165 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.2986 |
| old sequence number | 741 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 210 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.8085 |
| old sequence number | 106 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 212 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.7821 |
| old sequence number | 899 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 217 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.6905 |
| old sequence number | 790 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 225 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.6263 |
| old sequence number | 36 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 226 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6259 |
| old sequence number | 803 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 228 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6179 |
| old sequence number | 128 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 234 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.5749 |
| old sequence number | 852 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 258 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.3307 |
| old sequence number | 763 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 273 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.2175 |
| old sequence number | 891 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 277 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.1778 |
| old sequence number | 834 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 285 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.0971 |
| old sequence number | 85 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 307 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.8939 |
| old sequence number | 900 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 310 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.8612 |
| old sequence number | 76 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 330 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.6253 |
| old sequence number | 1236 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 334 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.5972 |
| old sequence number | 1121 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 339 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5778 |
| old sequence number | 747 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 362 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.3885 |
| old sequence number | 33 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 391 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.3037 |
| old sequence number | 804 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 411 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2345 |
| old sequence number | 1258 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 416 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2146 |
| old sequence number | 826 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 418 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2069 |
| old sequence number | 848 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 482 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0675 |
| old sequence number | 531 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 499 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0444 |
| old sequence number | 151 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 502 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0370 |
| old sequence number | 1161 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 506 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0296 |
| old sequence number | 516 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 524 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9787 |
| old sequence number | 1171 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 557 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8807 |
| old sequence number | 486 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 561 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8747 |
| old sequence number | 1259 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 571 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8400 |
| old sequence number | 173 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 572 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8372 |
| old sequence number | 1251 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 577 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8233 |
| old sequence number | 496 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 582 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8205 |
| old sequence number | 721 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 587 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.7988 |
| old sequence number | 897 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 595 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.7623 |
| old sequence number | 796 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 596 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.7620 |
| old sequence number | 764 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 598 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.7583 |
| old sequence number | 1066 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 603 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.7153 |
| old sequence number | 1123 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 613 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.6753 |
| old sequence number | 1163 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 614 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.6716 |
| old sequence number | 1141 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 630 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6231 |
| old sequence number | 879 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 634 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.6004 |
| old sequence number | 466 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 637 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5941 |
| old sequence number | 805 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 659 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.5134 |
| old sequence number | 121 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 670 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4556 |
| old sequence number | 832 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 674 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.4440 |
| old sequence number | 1126 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 707 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3774 |
| old sequence number | 421 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 718 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3663 |
| old sequence number | 78 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 755 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3228 |
| old sequence number | 1186 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 777 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2997 |
| old sequence number | 451 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 789 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2833 |
| old sequence number | 931 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 820 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2389 |
| old sequence number | 743 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 869 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1915 |
| old sequence number | 1426 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 890 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1775 |
| old sequence number | 849 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 936 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1489 |
| old sequence number | 511 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 945 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1462 |
| old sequence number | 127 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1005 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1193 |
| old sequence number | 1156 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1012 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1166 |
| old sequence number | 555 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1022 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1110 |
| old sequence number | 552 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1026 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1092 |
| old sequence number | 611 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1032 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1077 |
| old sequence number | 802 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1081 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0879 |
| old sequence number | 591 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1086 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0851 |
| old sequence number | 376 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1093 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0823 |
| old sequence number | 541 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1116 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0712 |
| old sequence number | 406 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1144 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0546 |
| old sequence number | 456 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1146 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0518 |
| old sequence number | 686 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1150 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0453 |
| old sequence number | 784 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1155 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0417 |
| old sequence number | 880 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1162 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0342 |
| old sequence number | 366 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1169 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0233 |
| old sequence number | 1257 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1171 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0196 |
| old sequence number | 1124 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1176 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0139 |
| old sequence number | 1320 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1177 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0120 |
| old sequence number | 756 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1180 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0074 |
| old sequence number | 859 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1184 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0010 |
| old sequence number | 765 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1186 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0000 |
| old sequence number | 1239 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1203 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.9454 |
| old sequence number | 153 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1204 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.9371 |
| old sequence number | 481 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1206 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9251 |
| old sequence number | 1165 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1207 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.9251 |
| old sequence number | 871 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1215 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.8927 |
| old sequence number | 1291 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1218 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.8779 |
| old sequence number | 79 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1221 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.8457 |
| old sequence number | 893 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1228 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.7718 |
| old sequence number | 850 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1231 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.7650 |
| old sequence number | 1103 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1232 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.7567 |
| old sequence number | 828 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1234 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.7447 |
| old sequence number | 841 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1241 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.7095 |
| old sequence number | 80 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1249 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.6670 |
| old sequence number | 1116 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1251 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.6642 |
| old sequence number | 1231 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1254 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.6494 |
| old sequence number | 166 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1256 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.6448 |
| old sequence number | 1162 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1259 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.6364 |
| old sequence number | 723 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1261 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.6312 |
| old sequence number | 1125 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1263 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.6115 |
| old sequence number | 154 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1264 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.6031 |
| old sequence number | 123 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1265 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.5787 |
| old sequence number | 744 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1267 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.5708 |
| old sequence number | 798 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1268 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.5698 |
| old sequence number | 1253 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1271 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.5523 |
| old sequence number | 877 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1272 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.5511 |
| old sequence number | 762 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1275 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.5384 |
| old sequence number | 1210 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1281 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.5190 |
| old sequence number | 1201 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1289 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4616 |
| old sequence number | 172 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1290 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.4579 |
| old sequence number | 526 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1291 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.4561 |
| old sequence number | 514 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1295 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.4348 |
| old sequence number | 483 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1299 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4080 |
| old sequence number | 1237 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1301 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4050 |
| old sequence number | 847 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1302 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.4022 |
| old sequence number | 894 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1303 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.4006 |
| old sequence number | 829 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1307 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.3819 |
| old sequence number | 1122 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1311 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3654 |
| old sequence number | 124 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1312 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3599 |
| old sequence number | 724 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1317 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.3284 |
| old sequence number | 745 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1318 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3228 |
| old sequence number | 799 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1320 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.3157 |
| old sequence number | 1207 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1322 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3053 |
| old sequence number | 1254 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1324 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.2942 |
| old sequence number | 736 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1326 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.2868 |
| old sequence number | 1189 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1327 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2812 |
| old sequence number | 125 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1329 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2738 |
| old sequence number | 758 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1330 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2738 |
| old sequence number | 830 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1331 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.2738 |
| old sequence number | 484 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1332 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2581 |
| old sequence number | 873 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1336 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2516 |
| old sequence number | 895 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1337 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.2414 |
| old sequence number | 1159 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1339 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2322 |
| old sequence number | 168 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1340 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.2313 |
| old sequence number | 886 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1343 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2229 |
| old sequence number | 843 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1346 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2165 |
| old sequence number | 1118 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1348 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.2118 |
| old sequence number | 1096 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1350 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2081 |
| old sequence number | 800 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1353 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.1970 |
| old sequence number | 485 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1354 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.1898 |
| old sequence number | 1255 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1356 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1813 |
| old sequence number | 742 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1357 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.1730 |
| old sequence number | 1246 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1359 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1685 |
| old sequence number | 1069 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1360 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1684 |
| old sequence number | 122 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1362 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.1554 |
| old sequence number | 1160 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1364 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1508 |
| old sequence number | 482 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1365 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.1508 |
| old sequence number | 933 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1366 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1480 |
| old sequence number | 827 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1368 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1378 |
| old sequence number | 892 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1369 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1360 |
| old sequence number | 797 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1370 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1351 |
| old sequence number | 1102 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1371 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.1332 |
| old sequence number | 1203 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1373 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1249 |
| old sequence number | 1082 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1374 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1230 |
| old sequence number | 169 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1375 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1203 |
| old sequence number | 759 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1376 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1147 |
| old sequence number | 1252 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1378 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1101 |
| old sequence number | 874 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1380 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1073 |
| old sequence number | 1119 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1381 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1073 |
| old sequence number | 844 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1387 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0879 |
| old sequence number | 1234 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1388 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0833 |
| old sequence number | 170 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1389 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0805 |
| old sequence number | 875 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1390 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.0786 |
| old sequence number | 751 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1392 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0675 |
| old sequence number | 1204 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1394 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0657 |
| old sequence number | 760 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1395 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.0638 |
| old sequence number | 1111 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1396 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.0620 |
| old sequence number | 738 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1397 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0620 |
| old sequence number | 845 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1398 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.0537 |
| old sequence number | 888 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1399 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0509 |
| old sequence number | 757 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1401 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.0490 |
| old sequence number | 1248 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1402 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0481 |
| old sequence number | 527 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1403 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0481 |
| old sequence number | 1120 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1404 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0472 |
| old sequence number | 167 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1405 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0472 |
| old sequence number | 1235 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1406 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.0453 |
| old sequence number | 1098 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1407 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0398 |
| old sequence number | 872 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1411 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0296 |
| old sequence number | 739 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1412 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0287 |
| old sequence number | 1249 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1413 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0287 |
| old sequence number | 1117 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1414 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0268 |
| old sequence number | 889 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1415 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0250 |
| old sequence number | 1099 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1417 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0250 |
| old sequence number | 1202 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1418 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0185 |
| old sequence number | 1100 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1419 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.0176 |
| old sequence number | 1113 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1420 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0176 |
| old sequence number | 740 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1421 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0167 |
| old sequence number | 890 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1422 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.0157 |
| old sequence number | 753 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1423 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0148 |
| old sequence number | 934 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1425 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0120 |
| old sequence number | 1250 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1426 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0093 |
| old sequence number | 887 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1427 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0093 |
| old sequence number | 737 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1428 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0093 |
| old sequence number | 1294 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1429 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0074 |
| old sequence number | 1247 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1431 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0065 |
| old sequence number | 754 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1432 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0046 |
| old sequence number | 1114 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1434 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0028 |
| old sequence number | 1115 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1435 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0028 |
| old sequence number | 755 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1436 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0019 |
| old sequence number | 1112 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1438 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0019 |
| old sequence number | 752 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|