Positive results for: PIP
Filter: All scenarios in which PIP is the best, according to the in-total metric.
In total, 383 configurations matched the filter.
| Configuration Nr. 3 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 9.0204 |
| old sequence number | 726 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 7 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 8.3075 |
| old sequence number | 746 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 12 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 7.3451 |
| old sequence number | 156 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 13 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 7.2861 |
| old sequence number | 863 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 15 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 7.2167 |
| old sequence number | 831 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 18 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 7.0412 |
| old sequence number | 884 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 19 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 7.0329 |
| old sequence number | 748 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 22 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.7268 |
| old sequence number | 896 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 26 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.4856 |
| old sequence number | 876 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 27 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.4505 |
| old sequence number | 91 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 29 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 6.3163 |
| old sequence number | 162 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 34 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 6.2132 |
| old sequence number | 178 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 35 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.1813 |
| old sequence number | 766 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 36 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 6.1558 |
| old sequence number | 853 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 37 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 6.1473 |
| old sequence number | 837 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 40 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 6.0929 |
| old sequence number | 885 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 41 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.0796 |
| old sequence number | 111 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 43 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.0620 |
| old sequence number | 761 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 45 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.9880 |
| old sequence number | 113 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 49 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.9149 |
| old sequence number | 126 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 55 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.7660 |
| old sequence number | 136 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 57 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.7558 |
| old sequence number | 811 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 58 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.7115 |
| old sequence number | 134 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 60 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.6790 |
| old sequence number | 786 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 61 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.6769 |
| old sequence number | 135 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 62 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.5976 |
| old sequence number | 820 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 64 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.5735 |
| old sequence number | 788 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 65 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.5671 |
| old sequence number | 801 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 66 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.5292 |
| old sequence number | 728 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 67 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.5100 |
| old sequence number | 749 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 68 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.5084 |
| old sequence number | 809 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 69 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.4929 |
| old sequence number | 854 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 70 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.4593 |
| old sequence number | 810 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 75 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.4352 |
| old sequence number | 176 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 77 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.4263 |
| old sequence number | 864 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 80 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.3650 |
| old sequence number | 179 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 83 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.3128 |
| old sequence number | 898 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 85 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.2581 |
| old sequence number | 69 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 88 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.2130 |
| old sequence number | 851 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 93 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.1175 |
| old sequence number | 81 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 96 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.0685 |
| old sequence number | 61 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 97 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.0436 |
| old sequence number | 132 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 100 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.9741 |
| old sequence number | 87 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 106 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.9241 |
| old sequence number | 83 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 107 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.9129 |
| old sequence number | 846 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 108 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.9075 |
| old sequence number | 48 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 109 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.9066 |
| old sequence number | 46 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 111 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.8963 |
| old sequence number | 807 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 112 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.8945 |
| old sequence number | 114 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 113 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.8705 |
| old sequence number | 70 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 114 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.8444 |
| old sequence number | 133 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 116 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.8344 |
| old sequence number | 158 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 117 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.8303 |
| old sequence number | 882 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 121 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.7943 |
| old sequence number | 833 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 134 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.6512 |
| old sequence number | 93 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 138 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.5956 |
| old sequence number | 855 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 148 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.5296 |
| old sequence number | 171 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 149 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.5296 |
| old sequence number | 789 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 153 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.4750 |
| old sequence number | 817 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 159 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.3965 |
| old sequence number | 180 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 165 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.2986 |
| old sequence number | 741 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 167 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.2694 |
| old sequence number | 865 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 170 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.2322 |
| old sequence number | 67 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 176 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.1647 |
| old sequence number | 768 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 184 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.0208 |
| old sequence number | 750 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 186 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.0000 |
| old sequence number | 115 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 195 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.9103 |
| old sequence number | 84 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 205 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.8400 |
| old sequence number | 856 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 210 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.8085 |
| old sequence number | 106 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 212 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.7821 |
| old sequence number | 899 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 217 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.6905 |
| old sequence number | 790 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 218 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.6818 |
| old sequence number | 781 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 226 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6259 |
| old sequence number | 803 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 228 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6179 |
| old sequence number | 128 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 234 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.5749 |
| old sequence number | 852 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 235 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.5541 |
| old sequence number | 138 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 243 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.4403 |
| old sequence number | 159 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 253 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.3728 |
| old sequence number | 769 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 256 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.3574 |
| old sequence number | 729 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 258 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.3307 |
| old sequence number | 763 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 272 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.2239 |
| old sequence number | 177 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 273 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.2175 |
| old sequence number | 891 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 274 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.2072 |
| old sequence number | 63 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 277 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.1778 |
| old sequence number | 834 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 284 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.1156 |
| old sequence number | 112 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 285 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.0971 |
| old sequence number | 85 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 295 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.0194 |
| old sequence number | 878 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 297 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.0019 |
| old sequence number | 813 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 298 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.9889 |
| old sequence number | 862 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 307 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.8939 |
| old sequence number | 900 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 308 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.8760 |
| old sequence number | 770 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 310 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.8612 |
| old sequence number | 76 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 318 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.7595 |
| old sequence number | 1086 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 324 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.6762 |
| old sequence number | 1108 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 326 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.6639 |
| old sequence number | 787 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 328 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.6361 |
| old sequence number | 346 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 330 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.6253 |
| old sequence number | 1236 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 334 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.5972 |
| old sequence number | 1121 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 339 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5778 |
| old sequence number | 747 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 349 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4824 |
| old sequence number | 916 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 352 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.4662 |
| old sequence number | 64 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 354 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4561 |
| old sequence number | 1106 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 355 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.4468 |
| old sequence number | 160 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 361 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.3969 |
| old sequence number | 129 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 363 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.3848 |
| old sequence number | 1088 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 369 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.3733 |
| old sequence number | 1109 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 370 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3710 |
| old sequence number | 82 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 372 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3676 |
| old sequence number | 1245 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 374 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.3626 |
| old sequence number | 1223 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 377 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.3478 |
| old sequence number | 1206 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 378 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3472 |
| old sequence number | 730 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 383 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3145 |
| old sequence number | 767 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 391 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.3037 |
| old sequence number | 804 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 397 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.2852 |
| old sequence number | 835 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 401 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2710 |
| old sequence number | 1021 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 411 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2345 |
| old sequence number | 1258 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 416 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2146 |
| old sequence number | 826 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 418 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2069 |
| old sequence number | 848 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 419 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2065 |
| old sequence number | 1256 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 420 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2063 |
| old sequence number | 1191 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 429 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1859 |
| old sequence number | 1224 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 438 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1594 |
| old sequence number | 1242 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 451 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1332 |
| old sequence number | 1101 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 466 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0934 |
| old sequence number | 814 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 472 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0870 |
| old sequence number | 1214 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 482 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0675 |
| old sequence number | 531 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 484 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0629 |
| old sequence number | 65 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 493 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0537 |
| old sequence number | 1193 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 499 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0444 |
| old sequence number | 151 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 502 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0370 |
| old sequence number | 1161 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 506 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0296 |
| old sequence number | 516 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 516 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.9944 |
| old sequence number | 108 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 521 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9861 |
| old sequence number | 1110 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 524 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9787 |
| old sequence number | 1171 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 532 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.9491 |
| old sequence number | 1213 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 533 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9481 |
| old sequence number | 1215 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 535 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9463 |
| old sequence number | 1221 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 536 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9417 |
| old sequence number | 1216 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 540 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.9315 |
| old sequence number | 518 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 550 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8936 |
| old sequence number | 1089 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 557 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8807 |
| old sequence number | 486 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 561 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8747 |
| old sequence number | 1259 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 567 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8528 |
| old sequence number | 539 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 571 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8400 |
| old sequence number | 173 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 572 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8372 |
| old sequence number | 1251 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 577 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8233 |
| old sequence number | 496 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 582 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8205 |
| old sequence number | 721 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 587 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.7988 |
| old sequence number | 897 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 588 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.7919 |
| old sequence number | 157 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 593 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.7678 |
| old sequence number | 540 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 595 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.7623 |
| old sequence number | 796 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 596 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.7620 |
| old sequence number | 764 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 598 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.7583 |
| old sequence number | 1066 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 603 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.7153 |
| old sequence number | 1123 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 606 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.7077 |
| old sequence number | 1148 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 608 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6947 |
| old sequence number | 130 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 609 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6910 |
| old sequence number | 1149 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 610 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.6910 |
| old sequence number | 1238 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 612 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.6821 |
| old sequence number | 1167 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 613 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.6753 |
| old sequence number | 1163 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 614 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.6716 |
| old sequence number | 1141 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 618 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.6688 |
| old sequence number | 62 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 622 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.6580 |
| old sequence number | 1212 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 625 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6457 |
| old sequence number | 1194 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 630 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6231 |
| old sequence number | 879 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 631 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.6198 |
| old sequence number | 783 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 634 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.6004 |
| old sequence number | 466 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 635 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5976 |
| old sequence number | 815 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 637 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5941 |
| old sequence number | 805 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 638 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.5930 |
| old sequence number | 492 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 640 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5856 |
| old sequence number | 488 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 641 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5754 |
| old sequence number | 938 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 642 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5754 |
| old sequence number | 473 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 643 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.5735 |
| old sequence number | 519 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 647 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5652 |
| old sequence number | 498 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 651 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5550 |
| old sequence number | 858 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 653 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.5495 |
| old sequence number | 537 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 657 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.5208 |
| old sequence number | 1276 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 659 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.5134 |
| old sequence number | 121 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 663 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4898 |
| old sequence number | 727 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 666 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.4792 |
| old sequence number | 1150 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 667 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4746 |
| old sequence number | 1173 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 670 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4556 |
| old sequence number | 832 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 672 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4518 |
| old sequence number | 1107 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 673 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.4456 |
| old sequence number | 1260 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 674 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.4440 |
| old sequence number | 1126 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 675 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.4394 |
| old sequence number | 1090 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 679 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4237 |
| old sequence number | 443 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 688 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.4033 |
| old sequence number | 436 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 697 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3895 |
| old sequence number | 1091 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 706 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3774 |
| old sequence number | 1176 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 707 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3774 |
| old sequence number | 421 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 711 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3728 |
| old sequence number | 444 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 714 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3700 |
| old sequence number | 109 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 718 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3663 |
| old sequence number | 78 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 747 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3275 |
| old sequence number | 1146 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 748 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3275 |
| old sequence number | 520 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 749 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3275 |
| old sequence number | 1226 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 755 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3228 |
| old sequence number | 1186 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 777 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2997 |
| old sequence number | 451 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 785 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2877 |
| old sequence number | 445 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 789 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2833 |
| old sequence number | 931 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 801 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2655 |
| old sequence number | 1208 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 805 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2599 |
| old sequence number | 423 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 818 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2396 |
| old sequence number | 812 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 820 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2389 |
| old sequence number | 743 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 828 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2313 |
| old sequence number | 489 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 848 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2100 |
| old sequence number | 1195 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 857 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2026 |
| old sequence number | 706 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 866 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1943 |
| old sequence number | 1164 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 869 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1915 |
| old sequence number | 1426 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 890 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1775 |
| old sequence number | 849 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 930 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1536 |
| old sequence number | 1081 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 936 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1489 |
| old sequence number | 511 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 945 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1462 |
| old sequence number | 127 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 970 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1351 |
| old sequence number | 441 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 989 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1249 |
| old sequence number | 501 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 999 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1212 |
| old sequence number | 471 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1001 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1203 |
| old sequence number | 1298 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1002 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1193 |
| old sequence number | 174 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1003 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1193 |
| old sequence number | 468 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1005 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1193 |
| old sequence number | 1156 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1032 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1077 |
| old sequence number | 802 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1042 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1036 |
| old sequence number | 442 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1080 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0897 |
| old sequence number | 1023 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1096 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0805 |
| old sequence number | 1218 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1112 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0731 |
| old sequence number | 110 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1116 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0712 |
| old sequence number | 406 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1131 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0638 |
| old sequence number | 517 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1139 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0592 |
| old sequence number | 1356 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1143 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0563 |
| old sequence number | 939 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1144 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0546 |
| old sequence number | 456 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1150 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0453 |
| old sequence number | 784 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1155 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0417 |
| old sequence number | 880 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1161 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0361 |
| old sequence number | 533 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1169 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0233 |
| old sequence number | 1257 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1171 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0196 |
| old sequence number | 1124 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1176 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0139 |
| old sequence number | 1320 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1177 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0120 |
| old sequence number | 756 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1180 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0074 |
| old sequence number | 859 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1184 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0010 |
| old sequence number | 765 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1186 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0000 |
| old sequence number | 1239 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1192 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.9769 |
| old sequence number | 918 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1202 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.9491 |
| old sequence number | 1143 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1203 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.9454 |
| old sequence number | 153 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1204 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.9371 |
| old sequence number | 481 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1206 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9251 |
| old sequence number | 1165 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1207 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.9251 |
| old sequence number | 871 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1213 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9029 |
| old sequence number | 490 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1215 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.8927 |
| old sequence number | 1291 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1216 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.8899 |
| old sequence number | 1192 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1218 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.8779 |
| old sequence number | 79 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1219 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.8621 |
| old sequence number | 1072 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1221 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.8457 |
| old sequence number | 893 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1223 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.8261 |
| old sequence number | 469 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1224 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.8113 |
| old sequence number | 438 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1225 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.7965 |
| old sequence number | 1209 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1226 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.7845 |
| old sequence number | 175 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1227 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.7808 |
| old sequence number | 107 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1228 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.7718 |
| old sequence number | 850 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1229 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.7715 |
| old sequence number | 1383 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1230 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.7706 |
| old sequence number | 785 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1231 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.7650 |
| old sequence number | 1103 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1232 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.7567 |
| old sequence number | 828 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1234 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.7447 |
| old sequence number | 841 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1236 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.7327 |
| old sequence number | 487 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1237 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.7308 |
| old sequence number | 1219 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1238 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.7243 |
| old sequence number | 1299 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1241 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.7095 |
| old sequence number | 80 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1243 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.7040 |
| old sequence number | 860 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1245 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.6836 |
| old sequence number | 534 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1247 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.6707 |
| old sequence number | 513 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1248 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.6698 |
| old sequence number | 1144 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1249 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.6670 |
| old sequence number | 1116 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1251 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.6642 |
| old sequence number | 1231 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1253 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.6614 |
| old sequence number | 1240 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1254 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.6494 |
| old sequence number | 166 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1256 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.6448 |
| old sequence number | 1162 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1257 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.6445 |
| old sequence number | 940 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1258 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.6411 |
| old sequence number | 1278 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1259 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.6364 |
| old sequence number | 723 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1261 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.6312 |
| old sequence number | 1125 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1263 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.6115 |
| old sequence number | 154 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1264 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.6031 |
| old sequence number | 123 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1265 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.5787 |
| old sequence number | 744 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1266 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.5763 |
| old sequence number | 439 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1267 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.5708 |
| old sequence number | 798 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1268 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.5698 |
| old sequence number | 1253 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1270 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.5657 |
| old sequence number | 1068 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1271 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.5523 |
| old sequence number | 877 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1272 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.5511 |
| old sequence number | 762 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1273 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.5476 |
| old sequence number | 782 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1275 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.5384 |
| old sequence number | 1210 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1277 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.5361 |
| old sequence number | 1024 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1278 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.5328 |
| old sequence number | 1145 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1279 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.5291 |
| old sequence number | 1188 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1281 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.5190 |
| old sequence number | 1201 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1284 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.4921 |
| old sequence number | 535 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1285 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4894 |
| old sequence number | 77 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1286 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.4801 |
| old sequence number | 1083 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1287 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4801 |
| old sequence number | 857 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1288 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.4690 |
| old sequence number | 440 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1289 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4616 |
| old sequence number | 172 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1290 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.4579 |
| old sequence number | 526 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1291 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.4561 |
| old sequence number | 514 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1294 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.4366 |
| old sequence number | 155 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1295 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.4348 |
| old sequence number | 483 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1296 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4339 |
| old sequence number | 1142 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1297 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4339 |
| old sequence number | 977 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1298 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.4274 |
| old sequence number | 1158 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1299 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4080 |
| old sequence number | 1237 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1301 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4050 |
| old sequence number | 847 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1302 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.4022 |
| old sequence number | 894 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1303 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.4006 |
| old sequence number | 829 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1304 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.3978 |
| old sequence number | 1300 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1305 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3922 |
| old sequence number | 1104 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1306 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3848 |
| old sequence number | 1384 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1307 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.3819 |
| old sequence number | 1122 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1308 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.3784 |
| old sequence number | 437 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1311 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3654 |
| old sequence number | 124 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1312 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3599 |
| old sequence number | 724 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1313 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.3525 |
| old sequence number | 1428 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1316 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.3293 |
| old sequence number | 515 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1317 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.3284 |
| old sequence number | 745 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1318 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3228 |
| old sequence number | 799 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1319 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.3219 |
| old sequence number | 532 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1320 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.3157 |
| old sequence number | 1207 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1322 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.3053 |
| old sequence number | 1254 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1323 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.3020 |
| old sequence number | 937 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1324 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.2942 |
| old sequence number | 736 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1326 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.2868 |
| old sequence number | 1189 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1327 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2812 |
| old sequence number | 125 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1328 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.2784 |
| old sequence number | 152 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1329 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2738 |
| old sequence number | 758 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1330 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2738 |
| old sequence number | 830 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1331 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.2738 |
| old sequence number | 484 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1332 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2581 |
| old sequence number | 873 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1333 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.2535 |
| old sequence number | 1084 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1336 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2516 |
| old sequence number | 895 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1337 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.2414 |
| old sequence number | 1159 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1339 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2322 |
| old sequence number | 168 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1340 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.2313 |
| old sequence number | 886 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1343 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2229 |
| old sequence number | 843 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1344 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2211 |
| old sequence number | 1105 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1346 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2165 |
| old sequence number | 1118 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1347 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2137 |
| old sequence number | 1190 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1348 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.2118 |
| old sequence number | 1096 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1349 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.2118 |
| old sequence number | 528 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1350 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2081 |
| old sequence number | 800 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1352 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.1980 |
| old sequence number | 1233 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1353 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.1970 |
| old sequence number | 485 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1354 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.1898 |
| old sequence number | 1255 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1355 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.1869 |
| old sequence number | 1085 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1356 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1813 |
| old sequence number | 742 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1357 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.1730 |
| old sequence number | 1246 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1359 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1685 |
| old sequence number | 1069 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1360 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1684 |
| old sequence number | 122 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1362 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.1554 |
| old sequence number | 1160 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1364 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1508 |
| old sequence number | 482 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1366 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1480 |
| old sequence number | 827 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1368 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1378 |
| old sequence number | 892 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1369 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1360 |
| old sequence number | 797 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1370 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1351 |
| old sequence number | 1102 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1371 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.1332 |
| old sequence number | 1203 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1373 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1249 |
| old sequence number | 1082 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1374 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1230 |
| old sequence number | 169 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1375 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1203 |
| old sequence number | 759 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1376 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1147 |
| old sequence number | 1252 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1378 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1101 |
| old sequence number | 874 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1379 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.1082 |
| old sequence number | 529 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1385 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0925 |
| old sequence number | 1157 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1387 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0879 |
| old sequence number | 1234 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1388 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0833 |
| old sequence number | 170 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1389 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0805 |
| old sequence number | 875 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1390 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.0786 |
| old sequence number | 751 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1392 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.0675 |
| old sequence number | 1204 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1393 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0666 |
| old sequence number | 530 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1394 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0657 |
| old sequence number | 760 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1395 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 0.0638 |
| old sequence number | 1111 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1405 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.0472 |
| old sequence number | 1235 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1406 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 0.0453 |
| old sequence number | 1098 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1407 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0398 |
| old sequence number | 872 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1413 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0287 |
| old sequence number | 1117 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|