Positive results for: FMLP
Filter: All scenarios in which FMLP is the best, according to the in-total metric.
In total, 815 configurations matched the filter.
| Configuration Nr. 1 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 9.4477 |
| old sequence number | 734 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 2 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 9.2147 |
| old sequence number | 733 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 4 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 8.8060 |
| old sequence number | 735 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 6 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 8.3774 |
| old sequence number | 867 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 8 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 8.2849 |
| old sequence number | 870 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 10 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 7.6052 |
| old sequence number | 869 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 14 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 7.2627 |
| old sequence number | 143 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 16 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 7.2035 |
| old sequence number | 164 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 20 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 6.7902 |
| old sequence number | 881 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 23 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 6.6910 |
| old sequence number | 144 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 30 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 6.2796 |
| old sequence number | 163 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 31 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 6.2720 |
| old sequence number | 147 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 32 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 6.2495 |
| old sequence number | 822 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 33 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 6.2187 |
| old sequence number | 838 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 38 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 6.1345 |
| old sequence number | 910 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 39 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 6.1056 |
| old sequence number | 117 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 42 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 6.0740 |
| old sequence number | 100 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 44 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 6.0028 |
| old sequence number | 909 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 46 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.9658 |
| old sequence number | 99 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 47 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.9618 |
| old sequence number | 927 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 48 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.9380 |
| old sequence number | 901 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 50 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.9112 |
| old sequence number | 145 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 51 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.9019 |
| old sequence number | 141 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 52 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.8488 |
| old sequence number | 731 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 53 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.8390 |
| old sequence number | 816 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 54 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.7715 |
| old sequence number | 97 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 56 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.7616 |
| old sequence number | 907 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 59 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.6890 |
| old sequence number | 921 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 63 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.5883 |
| old sequence number | 120 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 71 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.4592 |
| old sequence number | 943 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 73 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.4573 |
| old sequence number | 1058 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 74 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.4557 |
| old sequence number | 930 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 78 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 5.4230 |
| old sequence number | 1042 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 81 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.3361 |
| old sequence number | 868 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 82 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.3206 |
| old sequence number | 1059 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 84 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.3073 |
| old sequence number | 923 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 86 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.2479 |
| old sequence number | 1038 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 87 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 5.2343 |
| old sequence number | 1080 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 89 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.1981 |
| old sequence number | 1036 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 90 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.1918 |
| old sequence number | 908 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 91 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.1418 |
| old sequence number | 944 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 92 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 5.1369 |
| old sequence number | 1071 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 94 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 5.1101 |
| old sequence number | 98 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 95 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 5.0734 |
| old sequence number | 1079 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 101 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.9518 |
| old sequence number | 1077 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 102 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.9407 |
| old sequence number | 1026 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 103 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.9369 |
| old sequence number | 1015 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 104 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.9269 |
| old sequence number | 795 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 105 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.9251 |
| old sequence number | 142 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 110 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.9056 |
| old sequence number | 150 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 115 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.8366 |
| old sequence number | 941 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 118 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.8252 |
| old sequence number | 1032 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 119 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.8252 |
| old sequence number | 256 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 120 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.8191 |
| old sequence number | 825 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 122 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.7797 |
| old sequence number | 357 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 123 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.7714 |
| old sequence number | 1028 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 124 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.7604 |
| old sequence number | 309 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 125 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.7481 |
| old sequence number | 1045 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 126 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.7424 |
| old sequence number | 353 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 127 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.7373 |
| old sequence number | 52 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 128 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.6892 |
| old sequence number | 773 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 129 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.6836 |
| old sequence number | 351 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 130 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.6670 |
| old sequence number | 1060 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 132 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.6583 |
| old sequence number | 1006 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 133 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.6540 |
| old sequence number | 994 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 135 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.6425 |
| old sequence number | 1012 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 136 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.6330 |
| old sequence number | 984 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 137 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.6031 |
| old sequence number | 49 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 139 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.5911 |
| old sequence number | 337 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 141 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.5698 |
| old sequence number | 131 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 142 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.5640 |
| old sequence number | 1014 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 143 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5476 |
| old sequence number | 993 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 144 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5432 |
| old sequence number | 983 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 145 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5342 |
| old sequence number | 1078 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 146 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.5319 |
| old sequence number | 331 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 147 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.5319 |
| old sequence number | 340 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 150 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.5193 |
| old sequence number | 929 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 151 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.5088 |
| old sequence number | 308 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 152 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.4829 |
| old sequence number | 310 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 154 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.4533 |
| old sequence number | 119 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 156 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.4409 |
| old sequence number | 1035 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 157 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.4374 |
| old sequence number | 945 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 158 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.4089 |
| old sequence number | 319 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 160 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.3756 |
| old sequence number | 265 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 161 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.3691 |
| old sequence number | 262 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 162 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.3510 |
| old sequence number | 360 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 164 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.3034 |
| old sequence number | 903 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 166 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.2886 |
| old sequence number | 213 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 168 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.2599 |
| old sequence number | 1039 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 169 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.2562 |
| old sequence number | 50 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 171 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 4.2155 |
| old sequence number | 318 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 172 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 4.2109 |
| old sequence number | 1062 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 173 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.1970 |
| old sequence number | 320 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 175 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.1767 |
| old sequence number | 339 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 177 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.1393 |
| old sequence number | 985 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 178 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.1235 |
| old sequence number | 806 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 180 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 4.1074 |
| old sequence number | 995 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 181 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.0953 |
| old sequence number | 301 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 182 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 4.0890 |
| old sequence number | 794 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 185 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 4.0083 |
| old sequence number | 961 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 187 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.9917 |
| old sequence number | 354 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 189 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.9778 |
| old sequence number | 88 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 190 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.9621 |
| old sequence number | 55 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 191 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.9584 |
| old sequence number | 1044 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 192 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.9260 |
| old sequence number | 94 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 193 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.9158 |
| old sequence number | 47 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 194 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.9142 |
| old sequence number | 924 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 197 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.9047 |
| old sequence number | 288 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 198 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8973 |
| old sequence number | 264 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 199 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.8751 |
| old sequence number | 307 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 200 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.8730 |
| old sequence number | 1056 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 202 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8622 |
| old sequence number | 4 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 203 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.8612 |
| old sequence number | 286 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 204 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.8492 |
| old sequence number | 5 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 206 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8381 |
| old sequence number | 89 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 207 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8237 |
| old sequence number | 1034 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 208 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.8222 |
| old sequence number | 359 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 209 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.8150 |
| old sequence number | 2 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 211 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.7956 |
| old sequence number | 211 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 213 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.7500 |
| old sequence number | 967 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 214 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.7012 |
| old sequence number | 306 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 215 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.6963 |
| old sequence number | 1051 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 216 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.6955 |
| old sequence number | 1029 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 219 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6753 |
| old sequence number | 292 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 220 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.6741 |
| old sequence number | 981 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 221 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6522 |
| old sequence number | 963 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 222 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6401 |
| old sequence number | 317 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 223 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6298 |
| old sequence number | 1057 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 224 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6280 |
| old sequence number | 1013 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 227 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6179 |
| old sequence number | 272 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 229 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6167 |
| old sequence number | 312 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 230 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6152 |
| old sequence number | 217 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 231 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.6133 |
| old sequence number | 258 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 232 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.6015 |
| old sequence number | 987 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 233 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.5782 |
| old sequence number | 950 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 236 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.5541 |
| old sequence number | 214 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 238 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.5088 |
| old sequence number | 1040 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 239 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.5069 |
| old sequence number | 338 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 240 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.4894 |
| old sequence number | 275 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 241 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4826 |
| old sequence number | 942 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 242 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4439 |
| old sequence number | 912 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 244 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4237 |
| old sequence number | 992 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 245 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4209 |
| old sequence number | 72 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 246 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.4191 |
| old sequence number | 947 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 247 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.4126 |
| old sequence number | 949 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 248 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.3904 |
| old sequence number | 928 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 251 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.3848 |
| old sequence number | 289 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 252 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.3802 |
| old sequence number | 976 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 254 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.3663 |
| old sequence number | 1076 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 255 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.3611 |
| old sequence number | 970 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 257 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.3395 |
| old sequence number | 95 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 259 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.3287 |
| old sequence number | 997 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 261 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.2997 |
| old sequence number | 295 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 262 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.2914 |
| old sequence number | 243 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 263 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.2895 |
| old sequence number | 161 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 264 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.2775 |
| old sequence number | 263 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 265 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.2651 |
| old sequence number | 836 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 266 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.2572 |
| old sequence number | 86 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 267 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.2553 |
| old sequence number | 54 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 268 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.2451 |
| old sequence number | 982 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 269 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.2424 |
| old sequence number | 45 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 270 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.2308 |
| old sequence number | 1065 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 271 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.2248 |
| old sequence number | 333 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 275 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.1989 |
| old sequence number | 355 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 276 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.1860 |
| old sequence number | 1033 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 278 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.1750 |
| old sequence number | 1073 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 279 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.1582 |
| old sequence number | 149 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 280 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 3.1461 |
| old sequence number | 936 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 282 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.1388 |
| old sequence number | 44 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 283 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.1241 |
| old sequence number | 358 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 286 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0962 |
| old sequence number | 244 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 287 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0917 |
| old sequence number | 904 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 288 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.0817 |
| old sequence number | 990 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 289 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.0777 |
| old sequence number | 220 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 290 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0444 |
| old sequence number | 969 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 291 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0352 |
| old sequence number | 824 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 292 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 3.0333 |
| old sequence number | 274 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 293 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 3.0324 |
| old sequence number | 322 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 294 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 3.0298 |
| old sequence number | 925 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 296 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 3.0102 |
| old sequence number | 1008 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 299 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.9880 |
| old sequence number | 906 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 300 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.9843 |
| old sequence number | 245 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 301 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.9685 |
| old sequence number | 315 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 303 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.9214 |
| old sequence number | 118 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 304 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.9149 |
| old sequence number | 294 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 305 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.9084 |
| old sequence number | 66 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 306 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.8948 |
| old sequence number | 1064 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 309 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.8668 |
| old sequence number | 92 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 311 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.8491 |
| old sequence number | 991 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 312 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.8363 |
| old sequence number | 948 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 313 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.8048 |
| old sequence number | 43 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 314 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.7835 |
| old sequence number | 215 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 315 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.7780 |
| old sequence number | 241 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 316 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.7741 |
| old sequence number | 1011 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 319 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.7502 |
| old sequence number | 290 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 320 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.7433 |
| old sequence number | 1030 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 321 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.7391 |
| old sequence number | 793 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 322 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.7115 |
| old sequence number | 1043 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 323 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.6781 |
| old sequence number | 964 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 325 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.6698 |
| old sequence number | 219 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 327 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.6480 |
| old sequence number | 1017 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 329 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.6311 |
| old sequence number | 1092 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 331 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.6124 |
| old sequence number | 1095 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 332 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.6006 |
| old sequence number | 1000 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 333 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5985 |
| old sequence number | 227 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 335 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.5902 |
| old sequence number | 199 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 336 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5893 |
| old sequence number | 242 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 337 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.5846 |
| old sequence number | 316 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 338 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.5837 |
| old sequence number | 336 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 340 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.5735 |
| old sequence number | 75 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 341 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5541 |
| old sequence number | 247 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 342 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.5513 |
| old sequence number | 200 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 343 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5254 |
| old sequence number | 342 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 344 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.5172 |
| old sequence number | 989 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 345 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.5102 |
| old sequence number | 1037 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 346 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.4977 |
| old sequence number | 198 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 347 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4977 |
| old sequence number | 926 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 348 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.4875 |
| old sequence number | 261 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 350 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.4750 |
| old sequence number | 968 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 353 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.4561 |
| old sequence number | 7 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 356 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.4403 |
| old sequence number | 102 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 357 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.4394 |
| old sequence number | 259 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 358 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.4376 |
| old sequence number | 314 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 359 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.4348 |
| old sequence number | 273 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 360 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.4276 |
| old sequence number | 915 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 365 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.3765 |
| old sequence number | 293 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 366 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.3765 |
| old sequence number | 334 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 367 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3747 |
| old sequence number | 250 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 368 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3737 |
| old sequence number | 197 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 371 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.3704 |
| old sequence number | 1094 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 373 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3633 |
| old sequence number | 777 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 375 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3571 |
| old sequence number | 230 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 380 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3306 |
| old sequence number | 952 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 381 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.3265 |
| old sequence number | 352 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 382 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.3164 |
| old sequence number | 229 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 385 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3098 |
| old sequence number | 1020 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 386 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3090 |
| old sequence number | 905 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 388 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3090 |
| old sequence number | 325 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 393 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2979 |
| old sequence number | 267 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 395 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2905 |
| old sequence number | 182 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 398 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2794 |
| old sequence number | 303 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 402 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2710 |
| old sequence number | 202 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 403 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2673 |
| old sequence number | 999 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 404 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2581 |
| old sequence number | 356 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 405 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2537 |
| old sequence number | 1063 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 406 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2470 |
| old sequence number | 184 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 407 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2424 |
| old sequence number | 249 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 408 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2396 |
| old sequence number | 218 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 409 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2396 |
| old sequence number | 277 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 410 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2377 |
| old sequence number | 74 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 415 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.2155 |
| old sequence number | 196 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 417 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2128 |
| old sequence number | 1243 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 422 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1980 |
| old sequence number | 185 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 423 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1961 |
| old sequence number | 280 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 424 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1952 |
| old sequence number | 344 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 425 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1943 |
| old sequence number | 345 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 426 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1933 |
| old sequence number | 297 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 427 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1933 |
| old sequence number | 313 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 428 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1869 |
| old sequence number | 946 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 430 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1859 |
| old sequence number | 324 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 431 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1832 |
| old sequence number | 270 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 432 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1822 |
| old sequence number | 269 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 434 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1684 |
| old sequence number | 300 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 437 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1640 |
| old sequence number | 972 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 439 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1591 |
| old sequence number | 955 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 440 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1563 |
| old sequence number | 291 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 442 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1501 |
| old sequence number | 988 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 443 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1489 |
| old sequence number | 268 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 444 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1471 |
| old sequence number | 204 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 445 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1460 |
| old sequence number | 1031 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 446 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.1434 |
| old sequence number | 205 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 447 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1425 |
| old sequence number | 287 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 450 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1332 |
| old sequence number | 311 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 452 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1277 |
| old sequence number | 228 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 453 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1230 |
| old sequence number | 222 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 455 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1193 |
| old sequence number | 298 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 456 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1193 |
| old sequence number | 224 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 457 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.1184 |
| old sequence number | 327 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 459 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1184 |
| old sequence number | 266 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 460 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1125 |
| old sequence number | 1019 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 462 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1064 |
| old sequence number | 248 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 463 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1055 |
| old sequence number | 343 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 465 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0944 |
| old sequence number | 216 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 467 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0925 |
| old sequence number | 203 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 468 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0907 |
| old sequence number | 323 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 469 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0901 |
| old sequence number | 914 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 470 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0879 |
| old sequence number | 299 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 473 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0870 |
| old sequence number | 954 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 474 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.0868 |
| old sequence number | 1074 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 476 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0814 |
| old sequence number | 271 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 477 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0759 |
| old sequence number | 321 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 478 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0740 |
| old sequence number | 226 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 480 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0731 |
| old sequence number | 183 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 481 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0685 |
| old sequence number | 207 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 483 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0657 |
| old sequence number | 223 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 485 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0623 |
| old sequence number | 922 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 487 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0620 |
| old sequence number | 225 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 488 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0611 |
| old sequence number | 201 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 489 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0592 |
| old sequence number | 296 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 490 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0586 |
| old sequence number | 1047 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 491 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0564 |
| old sequence number | 210 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 492 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0546 |
| old sequence number | 252 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 494 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0500 |
| old sequence number | 255 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 495 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0490 |
| old sequence number | 341 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 496 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0481 |
| old sequence number | 966 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 497 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0463 |
| old sequence number | 140 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 498 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.0453 |
| old sequence number | 232 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 500 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0416 |
| old sequence number | 253 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 501 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0407 |
| old sequence number | 235 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 504 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0333 |
| old sequence number | 278 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 505 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0324 |
| old sequence number | 23 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 509 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.0241 |
| old sequence number | 998 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 511 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0185 |
| old sequence number | 246 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 512 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0185 |
| old sequence number | 116 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 513 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.0056 |
| old sequence number | 330 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 514 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.0028 |
| old sequence number | 1041 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 515 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9991 |
| old sequence number | 181 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 517 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9935 |
| old sequence number | 279 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 518 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9917 |
| old sequence number | 21 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 519 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.9889 |
| old sequence number | 1197 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 520 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.9870 |
| old sequence number | 1018 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 522 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.9806 |
| old sequence number | 913 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 523 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.9787 |
| old sequence number | 1267 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 525 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9778 |
| old sequence number | 975 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 526 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9704 |
| old sequence number | 965 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 527 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.9694 |
| old sequence number | 1227 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 529 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9667 |
| old sequence number | 254 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 530 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9620 |
| old sequence number | 974 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 534 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9471 |
| old sequence number | 1061 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 538 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9417 |
| old sequence number | 41 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 539 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9323 |
| old sequence number | 986 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 541 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9278 |
| old sequence number | 1200 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 542 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9241 |
| old sequence number | 1261 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 543 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.9237 |
| old sequence number | 1027 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 544 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9177 |
| old sequence number | 1016 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 545 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.9137 |
| old sequence number | 1050 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 547 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.9082 |
| old sequence number | 1049 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 548 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8991 |
| old sequence number | 1093 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 549 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8945 |
| old sequence number | 953 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 552 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8889 |
| old sequence number | 1002 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 553 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.8881 |
| old sequence number | 1180 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 554 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8880 |
| old sequence number | 1009 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 555 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8870 |
| old sequence number | 791 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 558 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8788 |
| old sequence number | 522 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 559 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8779 |
| old sequence number | 212 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 560 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8751 |
| old sequence number | 1283 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 563 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.8686 |
| old sequence number | 1270 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 564 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8684 |
| old sequence number | 957 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 565 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8603 |
| old sequence number | 96 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 566 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8538 |
| old sequence number | 1263 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 568 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8483 |
| old sequence number | 1287 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 569 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8463 |
| old sequence number | 973 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 570 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8444 |
| old sequence number | 996 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 573 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8353 |
| old sequence number | 53 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 574 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8298 |
| old sequence number | 1419 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 575 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.8270 |
| old sequence number | 1004 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 578 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8230 |
| old sequence number | 911 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 579 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.8222 |
| old sequence number | 1005 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 580 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8215 |
| old sequence number | 951 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 581 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.8205 |
| old sequence number | 27 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 583 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8204 |
| old sequence number | 1048 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 584 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.8159 |
| old sequence number | 505 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 586 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.8093 |
| old sequence number | 971 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 589 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.7882 |
| old sequence number | 1284 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 590 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.7863 |
| old sequence number | 1179 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 591 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.7771 |
| old sequence number | 1420 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 592 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.7743 |
| old sequence number | 1177 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 594 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.7641 |
| old sequence number | 260 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 597 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.7620 |
| old sequence number | 1053 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 599 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.7512 |
| old sequence number | 525 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 600 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.7484 |
| old sequence number | 73 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 601 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.7234 |
| old sequence number | 502 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 602 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.7169 |
| old sequence number | 504 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 604 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.7142 |
| old sequence number | 1417 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 605 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.7095 |
| old sequence number | 1399 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 607 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6966 |
| old sequence number | 335 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 611 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6883 |
| old sequence number | 1304 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 615 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.6707 |
| old sequence number | 771 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 616 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.6707 |
| old sequence number | 1398 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 617 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.6698 |
| old sequence number | 538 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 619 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6679 |
| old sequence number | 1305 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 620 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6633 |
| old sequence number | 1264 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 623 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6503 |
| old sequence number | 1269 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 627 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6337 |
| old sequence number | 1230 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 628 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.6300 |
| old sequence number | 1281 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 629 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.6253 |
| old sequence number | 1199 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 632 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6170 |
| old sequence number | 10 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 633 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.6161 |
| old sequence number | 1400 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 636 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5976 |
| old sequence number | 1285 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 639 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.5902 |
| old sequence number | 1437 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 644 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.5671 |
| old sequence number | 137 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 646 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5652 |
| old sequence number | 30 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 648 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5597 |
| old sequence number | 1178 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 649 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.5578 |
| old sequence number | 1222 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 652 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5537 |
| old sequence number | 1290 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 654 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.5467 |
| old sequence number | 1372 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 656 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.5315 |
| old sequence number | 780 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 660 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.5116 |
| old sequence number | 1418 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 661 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.5032 |
| old sequence number | 1389 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 662 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.4949 |
| old sequence number | 495 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 664 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4884 |
| old sequence number | 1302 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 665 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4810 |
| old sequence number | 1368 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 668 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4615 |
| old sequence number | 823 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 669 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4607 |
| old sequence number | 902 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 671 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.4524 |
| old sequence number | 1229 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 677 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4329 |
| old sequence number | 1352 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 678 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.4311 |
| old sequence number | 1366 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 680 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.4237 |
| old sequence number | 1355 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 681 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4191 |
| old sequence number | 693 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 682 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4181 |
| old sequence number | 1198 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 683 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.4154 |
| old sequence number | 148 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 685 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4126 |
| old sequence number | 1397 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 686 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.4089 |
| old sequence number | 1402 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 687 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.4070 |
| old sequence number | 1265 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 690 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3996 |
| old sequence number | 524 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 691 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3981 |
| old sequence number | 779 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 692 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3978 |
| old sequence number | 1440 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 693 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3969 |
| old sequence number | 697 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 694 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3950 |
| old sequence number | 1375 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 695 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3950 |
| old sequence number | 667 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 698 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3880 |
| old sequence number | 1303 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 699 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3858 |
| old sequence number | 1151 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 700 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3839 |
| old sequence number | 1139 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 701 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3824 |
| old sequence number | 1154 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 702 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3821 |
| old sequence number | 677 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 703 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3811 |
| old sequence number | 1152 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 704 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3811 |
| old sequence number | 1166 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 705 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3811 |
| old sequence number | 1433 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 708 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3765 |
| old sequence number | 105 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 709 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3747 |
| old sequence number | 714 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 710 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3737 |
| old sequence number | 503 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 712 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3719 |
| old sequence number | 1431 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 716 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3673 |
| old sequence number | 1183 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 719 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3636 |
| old sequence number | 1133 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 720 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3630 |
| old sequence number | 866 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 721 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3617 |
| old sequence number | 1153 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 722 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3599 |
| old sequence number | 1388 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 723 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3571 |
| old sequence number | 1134 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 724 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3562 |
| old sequence number | 454 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 725 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3552 |
| old sequence number | 670 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 726 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3525 |
| old sequence number | 1323 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 727 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3525 |
| old sequence number | 691 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 728 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3525 |
| old sequence number | 713 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 729 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3506 |
| old sequence number | 680 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 732 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3488 |
| old sequence number | 717 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 733 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3488 |
| old sequence number | 1354 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 734 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3488 |
| old sequence number | 618 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 735 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3478 |
| old sequence number | 1289 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 736 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3451 |
| old sequence number | 457 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 737 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3441 |
| old sequence number | 700 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 738 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3441 |
| old sequence number | 1137 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 739 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3432 |
| old sequence number | 1374 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 740 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3386 |
| old sequence number | 1168 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 741 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3377 |
| old sequence number | 649 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 742 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3367 |
| old sequence number | 1268 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 743 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3358 |
| old sequence number | 694 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 744 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3358 |
| old sequence number | 1010 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 745 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3330 |
| old sequence number | 648 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 746 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3321 |
| old sequence number | 715 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 750 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3265 |
| old sequence number | 1182 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 751 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3265 |
| old sequence number | 1135 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 752 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3256 |
| old sequence number | 1228 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 753 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3256 |
| old sequence number | 1344 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 754 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3247 |
| old sequence number | 1439 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 756 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3219 |
| old sequence number | 1390 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 757 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3219 |
| old sequence number | 622 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 758 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3201 |
| old sequence number | 1345 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 759 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3201 |
| old sequence number | 1184 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 760 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3201 |
| old sequence number | 1392 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 761 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3182 |
| old sequence number | 1342 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 763 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3173 |
| old sequence number | 720 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 764 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3173 |
| old sequence number | 679 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 766 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3145 |
| old sequence number | 1422 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 767 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3136 |
| old sequence number | 962 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 768 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3108 |
| old sequence number | 699 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 769 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3090 |
| old sequence number | 1140 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 770 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3080 |
| old sequence number | 669 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 771 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.3062 |
| old sequence number | 1132 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 772 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.3034 |
| old sequence number | 661 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 773 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.3025 |
| old sequence number | 1138 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 774 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.3019 |
| old sequence number | 1155 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 775 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.3016 |
| old sequence number | 29 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 776 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2997 |
| old sequence number | 1405 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 778 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2979 |
| old sequence number | 1288 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 779 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2979 |
| old sequence number | 8 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 780 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2951 |
| old sequence number | 1185 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 781 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2942 |
| old sequence number | 57 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 782 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2942 |
| old sequence number | 1136 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 783 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2905 |
| old sequence number | 494 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 784 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2895 |
| old sequence number | 499 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 786 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2877 |
| old sequence number | 332 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 788 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2840 |
| old sequence number | 1324 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 790 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2812 |
| old sequence number | 1396 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 791 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2803 |
| old sequence number | 104 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 792 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2803 |
| old sequence number | 668 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 793 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2794 |
| old sequence number | 1395 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 794 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2775 |
| old sequence number | 455 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 795 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2766 |
| old sequence number | 1353 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 796 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2738 |
| old sequence number | 821 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 797 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2710 |
| old sequence number | 304 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 799 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2692 |
| old sequence number | 605 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 800 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2664 |
| old sequence number | 712 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 802 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2655 |
| old sequence number | 650 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 803 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2646 |
| old sequence number | 1327 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 804 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2627 |
| old sequence number | 1307 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 806 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2590 |
| old sequence number | 28 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 808 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2553 |
| old sequence number | 574 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 809 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2553 |
| old sequence number | 1425 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 810 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2553 |
| old sequence number | 632 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 811 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2498 |
| old sequence number | 427 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 812 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2498 |
| old sequence number | 71 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 813 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2488 |
| old sequence number | 778 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 814 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2451 |
| old sequence number | 1438 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 815 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2433 |
| old sequence number | 678 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 816 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2414 |
| old sequence number | 652 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 817 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2414 |
| old sequence number | 625 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 819 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2396 |
| old sequence number | 493 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 821 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2377 |
| old sequence number | 1343 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 822 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2368 |
| old sequence number | 624 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 823 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2368 |
| old sequence number | 711 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 824 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2359 |
| old sequence number | 675 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 825 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2331 |
| old sequence number | 60 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 826 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2331 |
| old sequence number | 672 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 827 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2322 |
| old sequence number | 698 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 829 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2294 |
| old sequence number | 1282 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 830 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2266 |
| old sequence number | 719 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 831 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2250 |
| old sequence number | 1272 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 832 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2248 |
| old sequence number | 634 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 833 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2248 |
| old sequence number | 575 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 834 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2248 |
| old sequence number | 1416 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 835 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2239 |
| old sequence number | 604 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 836 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2229 |
| old sequence number | 452 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 837 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2229 |
| old sequence number | 1404 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 838 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2220 |
| old sequence number | 1329 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 839 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2220 |
| old sequence number | 577 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 840 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2211 |
| old sequence number | 1386 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 841 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2192 |
| old sequence number | 702 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 842 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2192 |
| old sequence number | 1330 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 843 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2183 |
| old sequence number | 1310 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 844 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2174 |
| old sequence number | 718 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 845 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.2174 |
| old sequence number | 1309 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 846 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2128 |
| old sequence number | 560 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 847 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.2100 |
| old sequence number | 635 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 849 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2081 |
| old sequence number | 1373 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 850 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2081 |
| old sequence number | 646 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 851 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2081 |
| old sequence number | 1321 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 852 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.2072 |
| old sequence number | 602 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 853 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2044 |
| old sequence number | 573 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 854 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2035 |
| old sequence number | 603 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 855 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.2035 |
| old sequence number | 616 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 856 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2026 |
| old sequence number | 523 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 858 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.2007 |
| old sequence number | 103 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 859 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1998 |
| old sequence number | 654 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 860 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1980 |
| old sequence number | 9 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 861 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1970 |
| old sequence number | 12 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 862 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1970 |
| old sequence number | 682 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 864 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1952 |
| old sequence number | 449 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 865 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1943 |
| old sequence number | 101 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 867 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1943 |
| old sequence number | 1286 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 868 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1917 |
| old sequence number | 1301 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 870 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1906 |
| old sequence number | 1308 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 871 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1906 |
| old sequence number | 776 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 872 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1887 |
| old sequence number | 559 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 873 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1887 |
| old sequence number | 623 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 874 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1878 |
| old sequence number | 674 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 875 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1869 |
| old sequence number | 1275 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 876 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1869 |
| old sequence number | 51 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 877 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1859 |
| old sequence number | 660 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 879 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1859 |
| old sequence number | 26 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 880 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1850 |
| old sequence number | 580 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 881 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1850 |
| old sequence number | 633 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 882 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1841 |
| old sequence number | 607 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 883 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1832 |
| old sequence number | 1377 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 884 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1813 |
| old sequence number | 562 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 885 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1804 |
| old sequence number | 450 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 886 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1795 |
| old sequence number | 640 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 887 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1795 |
| old sequence number | 1403 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 888 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1776 |
| old sequence number | 1424 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 889 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1776 |
| old sequence number | 705 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 891 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1767 |
| old sequence number | 619 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 892 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1759 |
| old sequence number | 1394 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 893 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1758 |
| old sequence number | 1393 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 894 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1758 |
| old sequence number | 1274 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 895 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1748 |
| old sequence number | 557 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 896 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1739 |
| old sequence number | 627 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 897 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1730 |
| old sequence number | 1347 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 898 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1730 |
| old sequence number | 1357 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 899 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1711 |
| old sequence number | 6 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 900 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1702 |
| old sequence number | 146 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 901 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1693 |
| old sequence number | 590 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 902 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1693 |
| old sequence number | 628 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 903 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1684 |
| old sequence number | 657 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 904 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1684 |
| old sequence number | 1423 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 905 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1674 |
| old sequence number | 673 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 906 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1674 |
| old sequence number | 683 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 907 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1674 |
| old sequence number | 589 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 908 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1674 |
| old sequence number | 666 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 911 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1665 |
| old sequence number | 477 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 912 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1647 |
| old sequence number | 14 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 913 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1637 |
| old sequence number | 1369 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 914 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1637 |
| old sequence number | 695 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 915 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1637 |
| old sequence number | 1130 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 916 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1637 |
| old sequence number | 571 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 917 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1628 |
| old sequence number | 610 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 918 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1628 |
| old sequence number | 479 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 919 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1610 |
| old sequence number | 655 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 920 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1610 |
| old sequence number | 663 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 921 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1600 |
| old sequence number | 647 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 923 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1582 |
| old sequence number | 567 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 925 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1563 |
| old sequence number | 716 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 926 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1554 |
| old sequence number | 606 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 928 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1554 |
| old sequence number | 13 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 929 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1545 |
| old sequence number | 609 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 931 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1536 |
| old sequence number | 1350 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 933 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1526 |
| old sequence number | 402 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 934 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1526 |
| old sequence number | 1359 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 935 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1508 |
| old sequence number | 690 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 937 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1481 |
| old sequence number | 1436 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 938 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1480 |
| old sequence number | 703 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 940 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1480 |
| old sequence number | 491 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 941 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1480 |
| old sequence number | 613 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 942 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1471 |
| old sequence number | 1413 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 943 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1471 |
| old sequence number | 1380 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 944 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1462 |
| old sequence number | 59 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 946 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1462 |
| old sequence number | 579 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 947 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1452 |
| old sequence number | 1407 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 948 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1452 |
| old sequence number | 500 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 949 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1443 |
| old sequence number | 565 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 951 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1443 |
| old sequence number | 480 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 952 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1443 |
| old sequence number | 563 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 953 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1425 |
| old sequence number | 1336 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 955 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1415 |
| old sequence number | 676 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 956 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1415 |
| old sequence number | 1360 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 957 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1415 |
| old sequence number | 1371 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 958 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1406 |
| old sequence number | 1401 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 959 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1388 |
| old sequence number | 435 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 960 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1388 |
| old sequence number | 630 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 962 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1378 |
| old sequence number | 588 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 964 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1378 |
| old sequence number | 404 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 965 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1369 |
| old sequence number | 639 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 966 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1369 |
| old sequence number | 572 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 967 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1360 |
| old sequence number | 460 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 968 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1360 |
| old sequence number | 432 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 969 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1360 |
| old sequence number | 621 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 971 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1351 |
| old sequence number | 545 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 972 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1351 |
| old sequence number | 578 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 973 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1341 |
| old sequence number | 629 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 976 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1332 |
| old sequence number | 1351 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 978 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1314 |
| old sequence number | 601 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 979 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1314 |
| old sequence number | 689 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 980 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1304 |
| old sequence number | 1325 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 981 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1304 |
| old sequence number | 631 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 982 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1304 |
| old sequence number | 615 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 983 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1295 |
| old sequence number | 558 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 984 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1286 |
| old sequence number | 15 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 985 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1286 |
| old sequence number | 585 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 987 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1267 |
| old sequence number | 1379 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 988 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1258 |
| old sequence number | 478 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 990 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1249 |
| old sequence number | 659 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 991 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1249 |
| old sequence number | 671 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 992 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1249 |
| old sequence number | 684 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 993 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1240 |
| old sequence number | 637 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 995 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1230 |
| old sequence number | 685 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 996 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1221 |
| old sequence number | 696 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 997 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1212 |
| old sequence number | 403 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 998 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1212 |
| old sequence number | 1334 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1004 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1193 |
| old sequence number | 595 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1006 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1193 |
| old sequence number | 447 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1008 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1184 |
| old sequence number | 543 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1009 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1184 |
| old sequence number | 521 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1010 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1175 |
| old sequence number | 542 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1011 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1175 |
| old sequence number | 1421 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1015 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1166 |
| old sequence number | 448 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1016 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1166 |
| old sequence number | 390 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1018 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1147 |
| old sequence number | 564 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1019 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1147 |
| old sequence number | 1348 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1020 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1129 |
| old sequence number | 583 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1021 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1119 |
| old sequence number | 1313 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1023 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1110 |
| old sequence number | 1314 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1024 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1101 |
| old sequence number | 1332 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1025 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1092 |
| old sequence number | 1378 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1027 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 1273 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1028 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 544 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1029 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 1317 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1030 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 1349 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1031 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1082 |
| old sequence number | 658 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1034 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1073 |
| old sequence number | 581 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1035 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1073 |
| old sequence number | 1127 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1036 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1064 |
| old sequence number | 704 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1038 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1055 |
| old sequence number | 381 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1040 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1045 |
| old sequence number | 459 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1041 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1036 |
| old sequence number | 612 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1043 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1036 |
| old sequence number | 592 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1044 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1036 |
| old sequence number | 507 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1045 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1036 |
| old sequence number | 257 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1046 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1027 |
| old sequence number | 687 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1047 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1018 |
| old sequence number | 584 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1049 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.1018 |
| old sequence number | 476 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1050 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.1018 |
| old sequence number | 653 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1051 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.1008 |
| old sequence number | 620 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1052 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.1008 |
| old sequence number | 1364 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1053 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.1008 |
| old sequence number | 587 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1058 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0990 |
| old sequence number | 1362 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1059 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0981 |
| old sequence number | 396 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1060 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0981 |
| old sequence number | 1328 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1061 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0981 |
| old sequence number | 651 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1062 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0971 |
| old sequence number | 1358 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1063 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0962 |
| old sequence number | 410 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1064 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0962 |
| old sequence number | 368 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1065 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0953 |
| old sequence number | 608 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1067 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0944 |
| old sequence number | 1306 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1068 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0934 |
| old sequence number | 701 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1069 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 387 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1070 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 1391 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1071 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 1341 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1072 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 1365 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1073 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0925 |
| old sequence number | 385 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1075 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0916 |
| old sequence number | 509 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1076 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0916 |
| old sequence number | 614 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1077 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0916 |
| old sequence number | 576 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1078 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0897 |
| old sequence number | 1315 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1079 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0897 |
| old sequence number | 1387 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1083 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0860 |
| old sequence number | 582 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1085 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0851 |
| old sequence number | 58 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1087 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0843 |
| old sequence number | 510 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1088 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0842 |
| old sequence number | 1312 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1089 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0842 |
| old sequence number | 1331 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1090 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0833 |
| old sequence number | 1346 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1091 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0833 |
| old sequence number | 1335 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1092 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0833 |
| old sequence number | 434 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1094 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0814 |
| old sequence number | 556 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1095 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0814 |
| old sequence number | 383 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1097 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0786 |
| old sequence number | 446 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1098 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0786 |
| old sequence number | 405 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1099 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0786 |
| old sequence number | 626 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1100 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0786 |
| old sequence number | 458 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1101 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0777 |
| old sequence number | 508 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1103 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0768 |
| old sequence number | 415 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1104 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0768 |
| old sequence number | 409 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1106 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0759 |
| old sequence number | 56 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1108 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0749 |
| old sequence number | 1326 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1109 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0749 |
| old sequence number | 1262 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1111 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0731 |
| old sequence number | 1409 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1114 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0722 |
| old sequence number | 417 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1115 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0722 |
| old sequence number | 681 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1117 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0712 |
| old sequence number | 463 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1119 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0694 |
| old sequence number | 561 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1121 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0675 |
| old sequence number | 420 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1122 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0666 |
| old sequence number | 426 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1123 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0666 |
| old sequence number | 414 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1125 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0648 |
| old sequence number | 1271 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1126 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0648 |
| old sequence number | 412 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1129 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0648 |
| old sequence number | 388 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1130 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0638 |
| old sequence number | 407 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1134 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0620 |
| old sequence number | 413 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1135 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0620 |
| old sequence number | 389 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1136 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0611 |
| old sequence number | 369 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1138 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0592 |
| old sequence number | 384 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1140 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0583 |
| old sequence number | 433 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1141 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0574 |
| old sequence number | 465 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1145 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0527 |
| old sequence number | 1319 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1147 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0500 |
| old sequence number | 386 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1148 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0481 |
| old sequence number | 462 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1149 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0463 |
| old sequence number | 411 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1151 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.0444 |
| old sequence number | 401 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1154 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0426 |
| old sequence number | 372 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1156 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0416 |
| old sequence number | 428 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1157 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 1.0416 |
| old sequence number | 1410 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1158 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0407 |
| old sequence number | 1322 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1164 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0315 |
| old sequence number | 418 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1165 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0287 |
| old sequence number | 1333 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1166 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0287 |
| old sequence number | 464 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1167 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.0259 |
| old sequence number | 1408 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1170 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0231 |
| old sequence number | 382 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1174 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 1.0148 |
| old sequence number | 419 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1179 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | medium |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0120 |
| old sequence number | 367 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1185 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 1.0000 |
| old sequence number | 377 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1188 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.9981 |
| old sequence number | 1054 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1191 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.9769 |
| old sequence number | 497 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1196 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9667 |
| old sequence number | 1175 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1198 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.9602 |
| old sequence number | 364 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1199 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.9602 |
| old sequence number | 617 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1200 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9565 |
| old sequence number | 1370 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1205 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.9288 |
| old sequence number | 692 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1208 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9214 |
| old sequence number | 365 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1209 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.9112 |
| old sequence number | 305 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1210 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.9093 |
| old sequence number | 362 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1211 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.9047 |
| old sequence number | 1007 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1212 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.9029 |
| old sequence number | 664 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1214 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.8936 |
| old sequence number | 422 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1220 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.8557 |
| old sequence number | 1172 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1239 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.7243 |
| old sequence number | 1414 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1240 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.7234 |
| old sequence number | 665 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1244 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.6864 |
| old sequence number | 1367 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1260 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.6339 |
| old sequence number | 1055 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1262 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.6290 |
| old sequence number | 302 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1269 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.5689 |
| old sequence number | 467 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1274 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.5439 |
| old sequence number | 1415 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1276 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.5375 |
| old sequence number | 349 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1282 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.5143 |
| old sequence number | 662 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1292 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.4533 |
| old sequence number | 1052 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1293 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 0.4487 |
| old sequence number | 709 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1310 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.3673 |
| old sequence number | 350 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1314 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.3497 |
| old sequence number | 710 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1321 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.3099 |
| old sequence number | 1412 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1334 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-1-1000 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.2535 |
| old sequence number | 512 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1335 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.2525 |
| old sequence number | 347 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1338 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.2340 |
| old sequence number | 707 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1345 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.2192 |
| old sequence number | 920 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1363 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1536 |
| old sequence number | 1022 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1372 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 0.1323 |
| old sequence number | 1280 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1377 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1119 |
| old sequence number | 917 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1382 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.1064 |
| old sequence number | 1382 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1384 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-medium |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 16 |
| access probability | 25% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0981 |
| old sequence number | 1277 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 1409 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 50% |
| CSL | long |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 0.0361 |
| old sequence number | 1067 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|